AS PART OF our 2016 Hurling championship coverage, weโve enlisted the expertise of Tipperaryโs 2001 All-Ireland winning captain and former team coach Tommy Dunne.
Tommy has joined The42 for the summer and starts today by taking a closer look at Tipperaryโs victory over Cork in last Sundayโs Munster SHC quarter-final at Semple Stadium.
**************************
THE FIRST THING to say, from a Tipp perspective, was that this was a very solid performance, really efficient and clinical.
If youโre in Michael Ryanโs shoes, you deserve a lot of credit, mainly in terms of team selection.
There would have been surprise at the inclusion of four debutants and if youโre outside the camp, youโd have known little about them.
It was a gutsy move by management to hand these fellas a start, no matter how well theyโre going in training.
It paid off on a couple of different levels from managementโs point of view and creates a hugely positive dynamic within the squad.
The message is clear: if youโre training well, thereโs a chance youโre going to get rewarded and Michael has no problem leaving off more established guys if your form is good enough in training.
That should really benefit the entire panel but you have to take into account that there will be sterner tests for Tipp to overcome.
Now, Iโll take a more in-depth look at the main contributory factors in Tipperaryโs victory, and Corkโs poor display.
Corkโs defensive malfunction
Cork set up with William Egan sitting very deep. My take on this is that it wasnโt actually a sweeper system at all.
Egan was actually there to prevent goals being scored by Tippโs inside forwards but he offered no relief to Corkโs full-back or half-back lines, which is essentially the job that the sweeper is there to fulfil.
He offered a screen in front of goalkeeper Anthony Nash and if Seamus Callanan or John McGrath got inside, Egan was going to be in a position to stop them attacking the Cork goal.
From a Cork point of view, he was effective in the sense that there were no clear goal chances but Tipp picked them off with points from outside.
Cork didnโt have a plan to deal with the long-range shooters and that left Egan effectively redundant.
I can only deduce that Egan was told to hold his position in case one of the Tipp inside forwards broke the first tackle and he was going to be there to rule out a one-on-one with Nash.
But there was no positive defensive effect to having him there. In fairness to the Tipp players outside, the quality of ball going in was good and they had obviously expected Cork to set up how they did.
However, a proper sweeper would be covering those angled balls, ensuring that they didnโt find their intended targets.
Tipp kept it narrow inside so there was space in the outside channels to exploit.
A prime example of this was Seamus Callananโs first point from play, resulting from a diagonal cross-field ball from Brendan Maher.
Seamus gained possession, wriggled clear of his marker Damien Cahalane and flashed over a point.
It was a terrific ball that allowed Seamus time to take it on the run, turn his man and pop it over.
The precedent was set there and then as to how Tipp wanted to pick Cork off, by dragging their defenders into uncomfortable positions.
Seamus then scored that superb point from the touchline, with Cahalane trailing in his wake once again.
The first picture above shows John OโDwyer gaining possession before he flashes a diagonal ball to the opposite wing. Seamus gives chase but as you can see, still has work to do against Cahalane.
A fair shoulder charge allows Seamus to gain possession and while he feinted as if he was going to play a ball across the face of goal, he shot over the bar from an incredible angle.
Seamus needed a couple of touches to get the ball into his hand but there was no second Cork player coming into that contact area and after winning that first tussle, Seamus had the advantage.
Egan was the extra defensive player but it seemed quite clear that he wasnโt asked to move towards the touchlines to provide added cover.
In many ways, Egan was caught between a rock and a hard place. His defensive instinct in the above example was surely telling him to move across and help out Cahalane but he was under instruction to prevent goals and to stay close to Nash.
John McGrathโs influence
Tippโs overall touch, accuracy, organisation and work-ethic was really, really good.
They hit 22 points and went about their business very well, although Cork didnโt apply any great pressure to Tipp players on the ball.
Tipp, when they had possession, were still very good with it. There was that lovely pass from Pรกdraic Maher to Sean Curran in the first half, when Pรกdraic took an extra moment or two to compose himself before taking the right option.
John McGrath was a prime example of a player using his head. He made 18 plays during the game and when you consider that Cork forwards Patrick Horgan, Conor Lehane and Seamus Harnedy made just 21 plays between them, itโs a big statistic.
When the Cork defenders got their tackles in, Tippโs ball retention was very good. They were able to break tackles and lay the ball off to a better-placed team-mate. Brendan Maherโs early point was a really good example of this, when he profited from John McGrathโs good work.
In the sequence, John is surrounded by Cork defenders when he gains possession but he manages to get free and pops off a pass to Brendan, who has time and space to put the ball over the bar from the New Stand side of the field.
That score put Tipp 0-4 to 0-1 ahead but John also played a key role in Tippโs second points, scored by โBubblesโ OโDwyer, as the sequence below illustrates.
John feints as if heโs about to make a run down the right touchline but he checks inside, turns back and feeds Bubbles for the score. It might look simple but it requires game intelligence and composure in equal measure.
What John McGrath, Sean Curran and Dan McCormack were really good at on Sunday was drawing Cork defenders into a ruck, holding the ball for just the right length of time and then laying it off to a team-mate in space. As I say, it might look easy but it requires a lot of work to execute correctly.
Tippโs game management
Tipp got themselves into a position where they led by 0-14 to 0-5 at half-time, and that gap stretched out to 11 points, 0-16 to 0-5, early in the second half.
From there, Tipp were able to keep Cork at armโs length and it was a task that was quite easy because Cork didnโt change their approach.
Brendan Maher and Michael Breen ruled the roost at midfield and the Maher brothers, Ronan and Pรกdraic, were very comfortable in the half-back line.
Tipp dominated the key areas and I also noticed that the โspare manโ was an interchangeable role. Pรกdraic played it, so did Ronan, as did Seamus Kennedy. There was even an occasion when James Barry filled into that hole and all of the players that went in there were comfortable.
Again, Tipp were very well-organised but they had a fair idea of what was coming from Cork and that allowed them to tailor a game-plan that ultimately proved successful.
The real key factor in this game from a Cork viewpoint was keeping Seamus Callanan quiet. That was their big strategy and as Iโve discussed above, they went with Damien Cahalane man-marking him, and with Egan sitting very deep.
But that strategy was rendered null and void when Callanan scored his first point from play, as discussed above. Cahalane was left one-on-one with Seamus on the Old Stand touchline and after gaining the space he needed, Seamus flashed the ball over the bar, with the โsweeperโ, a misnomer in my view, marked absent.
Callanan now had that early exchange in his favour and thatโs a huge thing for a key player.
It was a very good ball but in truth, not much more than 50-50 in Callananโs favour, slightly in his favour. Cahalane was tight on Seamus but Tipp went for the jugular early in terms of getting him into the game.
The idea, if you were in Corkโs shoes, was to attack Callanan and win those early exchanges with him, get on top of him physically and mentally but the reality was that Tipp turned it around and did it to Cork instead. The message was: โyouโre targeting our main man but rather than bypass him, weโre going to feed him.โ
Conclusion
The game was won and lost in the first half. There wasnโt any game-changing event after that. The key period for Tipp was coming into half-time when Tipp were seven points clear and moved nine ahead by the interval.
Bubbles picked off a point in the first minute of stoppage time but not for the first time, Cork were the architects of their own downfall as the basics failed them.
Not only were Cork guilty of gifting Tipperary possession time and time again, but the fact they were doing that meant that the supply of ball going into the likes of Horgan, Harnedy and Lehane was poor.
They tried to build from the back but what they were trying to do was utterly ridiculous.
The Bubbles score Iโve just mentioned illustrates my point. William Egan gained possession on his own end-line before transferring a pass to Mark Ellis, who then attempted a 30-metre pass to Conor OโSullivan coming out of defence.
OโSullivan fails to gather at the first attempt, picks the ball but then Cork cough up possession as a basic handpass to Ellis, who has now moved forward, goes astray.
Sean Curran is quickly on the scene, pops a simple pass to Bubbles and he slots it over. A catalogue of errors from Cork and within 17 seconds of Egan getting the ball in his hand, Tipp had the ball over the bar.
Conditions didnโt accommodate what Cork were trying to do. The point Iโm making in relation to the Cork forwards is that while, sure, it wasnโt a good day at the office for them, they werenโt helped by what was happening at the other end of the field.
It should also be said, however, that the Cork forwards werenโt able to win their exchanges against Tippโs defenders, and theyโre going to come under the microscope from that point of view.
Tippโs defensive game was solid as a rock but a player like Patrick Horgan, in particular, needs good quality ball.
Seamus Harnedy is well able to fight for his own possession but he too likes the ball put into space where he can break from the centre and do damage from there.
To sum up, there were a number of key factors that influenced the end result, as Iโve outlined.
Tipp were good but Cork didnโt help themselves by using a defensive system that simply didnโt work, while also falling down in some of the fundamental aspects of their play.
When you strip it all back, Tipp controlled the game pretty much from start to finish, but they didnโt have to be anywhere near full throttle to get the job done.
The42 is on Snapchat! Tap the button below on your phone to add!
God its depressing
Frank Murphy is a blight on Cork. I have never in my life seen a Cork side so poor, Tipp were in 2nd gear the whole way through and could have delivered an utter humiliation on the scoreboard had they wanted too. Itโs depressing to say the least. I have seen not so good Cork teams steal an All Ireland and wonderful Cork sides go on and win 3 or 4 but I have never seen one not stand up and fight against Tipp in Thurles. Work rate, passion, basic skills, hurling intelligence, aerial ability and craft all missing.
To be honest that performance was worthy of nothing more than Christy ring cup hurling
You donโt need an exceptional article like this to know that the county board are the architects of the fall of gaa in cork.
Absolutely.. This was flagged 10 years ago by Donal Og, Sean Og and John Gardenerโฆ They saw how other counties were ramping up player development and training infrastructure and were prepared to fight for itโฆ The County Board lost the battle but won the war as they played the long gameโฆ Waited for the โtrouble makersโ to retire and then reverted back to typeโฆ
We are now seeing the consequences of this.
Ok CCB is crap but hold on a second, itโs not as if thereโs been a raft of retirees in the last two years, 10 of the starting team the last day were playing and 30 secs off winning an All Ireland less than 3yrs ago. To say the standard of player thatโs there now is that bad is just wrong. Fair enough they wouldnโt be good enough to be close to an All Ireland now but their definitely not as bad a group as we saw on Sunday. Is it the management or players themselves maybe, but Frank Murphy wasnโt playing Midfield the last day and I want change as much as anyone else but lazy analysis of every of Cork hurling loss is all it is. They won the Munster championship only 2 years ago like, Itโs becoming a farce by everyone at this stage!
Spot on Lad. It seems every time Cork lose a game it falls back on Frank and the CCB. Frank was at the helm for a good shot of our 30 or so All-Irelands so I canโt see how our current status can be fully attributed to him. The board has plenty of competitions running, and runs them as best they can as far as I can see. They have a dedicated Bord na nOg for running the underage competitions so not sure what people are looking for when they refer to our underage structures. It has been mentioned too about our lack of success at underage and schools level but Limerick and Galway have both had great success at minor/u21 levels (Limerick at schools level as well) and still havenโt managed to break through at senior yet so it canโt be all that either. More than likely itโs probably a combination of some or all of the above but I donโt think it all rests on one particular element. I think whatโs most disappointing for me the last couple of years is a lack of intensity in our play and we seem to be getting beaten way too easily. The recent All-Ireland semi final to Tipp and last Sundays game stand out in that regard for me. Canโt quite figure where that is coming from, but I think Iโm right in saying that if a team plays at a high enough intensity (considering that we always had a high enough skill level) that we would be there or thereabouts every year.
Reading that youโd swear the cork game plan had been left in a taxi in thurles on saturday night.
Jasus lads you canโt blame everything on the county boardโฆ Frank Murphy wasnโt playing midfield Sunday โฆ It was the most heartless performance Iโve ever seen by cork in a championship gameโฆplayers have to take responsibility here
It also has become clear that when you take into account the league form and now this hammering in the championship that thereโs two assumptions .. Either Kingston has no idea what heโs doing what so ever as in was there for all two see on Sunday or we just donโt have the players to compete at this level at the moment .. Iโm tending to sway with the first 1
Heโs only in job recently.The man deserves time as I think Cork simply dont have the standard of players that they once had.Cutting him down far too soon
In 2010, the result was 180 degrees to this, Tipp lost to Cork by 10 points at the same stage. But, who won the All-Ireland that September? So, perhaps Cork can do the same now?
Piss poor hurling
Far far too much analysis. Cork had no heart
Hurling draw a joke laughable.. Cork had to beat tip n lim to get to quaters Galway hav 2 training sessions to get to quaters โฆfair????
Whats a quater?
Explain your raving a bit better Brian.
Quaters final of all Ireland cum on Jon cop on
The all Ireland hurling draw is so unfairโฆcork gota beat tip n lim to get to the quaters final of all Ireland Galway gota beat Westmeath n loais r Offalyโฆ.tha fair???
Would we beat any of those at the moment Brian? Possibly unfair that Galway could make it to quarters without a decent challenge tooโฆ.checks and balances I think really.
You think Galway would want an easy run in the Leinster championship? It serves Galway no good , but who is to say any of those teams wouldnโt beat them.
Michael Ryan deserves Credit but according to this article Anyone in Michael Ryanโs shoes deserves credit. I donโt understand the reticence in being up front in awarding him โCreditโ to him directly.
Maybe itโs a Club thing.
Is the all Ireland hurling draw fair??? Gota b noโฆ..cork have to beat tip n lim to get to the all Ireland quater final Galway gota beat Westmeath then offaly r laois..fair???