FORMER TOUR DE FRANCE winner Stephen Roche believes that cycling’s doping problems are a thing of the past, despite the revelations surrounding American cyclist Lance Armstrong in recent months.
Armstrong and his associates in the United States Postal Service team stand accused of creating the “most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen” by the US Anti-doping Agency.
Roche, who won the biggest event on the cycling calendar in 1987, feels that the sport is the cleanest it has ever been and is dismayed that recent events have dragged its name through the mud.
“Cycling has come along a lot since 1999. Maybe it got worse before getting better in the early 2000s, but definitely in 2010, 2011, 2012, even though (Alberto) Contador had his problems, cycling has come on an awful lot,” insisted Roche.
“Whatever mischief was going on then could never happen today.
“The proof the system’s working is that a guy like Bradley Wiggins has come along and he’s suspected of being clean, which is brilliant, and he’s come out and won the Tour de France.”
Team Sky have recently stated their intention to sever ties with any rider that has ever doped. Roche is good friends with Sean Yates, Team Sky’s sports director and a man who used to have strong links to Armstrong. The Irishman feels it would be wrong to reprimand Yates purely on the basis of his association with the disgraced Texan.
Roche added: “Is everybody guilty through association? In that case, get rid of everybody. Wipe out half the peloton, half the directeur sportifs, half the managers, half the UCI and then start from scratch.
“I’d understand, but I don’t think it’s really fair. It’s a bit radical to tear things up like that.
“Sean has been a great part of Sky. He’s been a great asset to cycling. I think it’s unfortunate if he loses his job now because of this.
“There are others in the same situation and I don’t know if this is the right way to tackle the problem.”
people in glass houses. read the roche biography. why is he risking opening the can of worms that that suggests lie ready to be opened in relation to roche himself?
He says above:
“The proof the system’s working is that a guy like Bradley Wiggins has come along and he’s suspected of being clean, which is brilliant…”
Imagine being part of a sport where the best offered proof is a suspicion of not cheating.
Does anyone else find that the language that Roche senior or Roche junior or Kelly use when they talk about drugs is unusually circumspect?
Previously one of my heroes, Mr. Roche, but not any more since the numerous revelations ect…so I won’t be listening to him or his ilk anymore……only the honest ones from now on.
this coming from the man who practically wrote the book on using epo to win the tour de France! seems a lot of former (and current) cyclists are very eager to say that cycling was fine before Lance and will be fine after him, a lot of heads in the sand
“Cycling has come along a lot since 1999. Maybe it got worse before getting better in the early 2000s, but definitely in 2010, 2011, 2012, even though (Alberto) Contador had his problems, cycling has come on an awful lot,”
By Contador having problems does he mean getting caught doping? Cycling is rotten to the core. The laissez-faire attitude to drugs shown by Roche Snr and Jnr not to mention the UCI means it’ll probably never be clean.