THIS WEEK WILL be among the toughest in the careers of Irelandโs players as they deal with the reality of being out of the World Cup.
Itโs incredibly tough, sickening even. I know, Iโve been there.
In 2003, we went out in the quarter-finals, but 2007 was even worse. Out at the group stage after all the hype and expectation, all the hope that we could achieve a semi-final or even a final. Devastating.
With this Ireland group, because of the back-to-back Six Nations titles and some big scalps that theyโve taken in the last two years, the hype was justified. But itโs a nightmare for the lads heading home early, particularly after such a resounding loss.
The cure is getting back on the pitch.
Itโs the only way to move on, because the failure can linger in your mind if youโre at a loose end. Having a week off โ any down time really โ is horrible.
Losing a Heineken Cup final was the very worst because you had a whole summer of thinking about it. These Ireland players will just want to be back on the pitch and shaking off the memory of it.
In the first 20 minutes on Sunday, Argentina brought an unbelievable physicality and aggression to every single tackle and carry. Unlike at previous World Cups, they maintained it for the full 80.
When it mattered, they took their scores. From having played against them over the years, theyโre a completely different team when they have to come from behind.
They tend to force things, become indisciplined and allow you to kick your points.
Ireland, to me, veered off their game plan in their attempt to catch Argentina. They would have gone out with a plan that involved lots of kicking off Conor Murray and Ian Madigan, turning the Argentinians and putting them under pressure that way.
When you go so many points behind, the mindset can change, even though it might be away from what you trained all week, away from Joe Schmidtโs game plan. Guys are thinking, โShit, weโre chasing this game.โ
Lads can go off individually rather than sticking to the blueprint. I think thatโs where we lacked the leaders who were missing on Sunday.
What would Paul OโConnell and Johnny Sexton have done differently? Itโs about understanding the situation when youโre on the field. Sometimes itโs not actually about โadaptingโ at all, but instead staying cool enough to stick to the original strategy.
A less experienced player looks at the scoreboard and thinks, โWeโve got to do something different here.โ A leader is capable of calming themselves and others, realising that the situation is totally changed but that the game plan will work.
With more than 25 minutes to go, Ireland were just three points behind, at 23-20. After all that had come before, and even with the missed shot at goal, they were very much in it.
At that point, itโs not about someone coming up with something special, itโs about experienced players saying, โwe know what the plan is, weโve done the work, weโve come back into this game.โ
An inexperienced playerโs mind might still be stuck on the fact that Ireland were 17-0 down at one stage, and it is very hard to shake that uneasy feeling.
Where was the search for territory when Ireland were back to 23-20? Itโs what theyโve so often been built on under Joe. Instead, they looked to play out of their own half with an attacking plan that isnโt really suited to doing that.
In the first half when Madigan hit the post with a penalty at 20-10, Santiago Cordero tried to run the ball out from underneath his own posts, Iain Henderson got a big hand to the ball, knock on.
Argentina throw the ball around and take risks, so why didnโt they find themselves in that situation more?
A good kicking game, a really aggressive kick chase โ thatโs what Ireland have been good at under Joe. I just felt they tried to force things when there was still time on the clock.
Ireland generally couldnโt get over the gainline. One Argentinian tackler would fly at the carriersโ ankles and the next defender would smash in high on the ball. Irelandโs main carriers โ Heaslip, Henderson and Healy โ just werenโt making yards and it was a worrying sight from early in the game.
Argentinaโs one-off carries were getting over the gainline and the Irish defenders were soaking the tackle.
The Pumas won the battle of the collisions and fed off it. They had forwards who were able to handle the ball. I thought Juan Martรญn Fernรกndez Lobbe was sensational stepping in at first receiver, carrying and also skipping players, passing to the edges.
It looked like Ireland didnโt expect them to play to the wide channels and they were rampant there.
Argentinaโs game plan was to target Ireland in those areas and they stuck to it ruthlessly, even when Ireland got back to within three points. Schmidtโs men, on the other hand, veered from their plan under the mental stress of a World Cup quarter-final.
That makes the disappointment all the greater.
The last few weeks have been exciting anyway & I can imagine another few twists & turns before the season is out!
Either way itโs the first league of Ireland game Iโve ever wanted to watch and Iโm 31.