THE GPA ARE not happy that their radical proposals to reform the All-Ireland football championship structure were ignored by the GAA’s Central Council.
But now the GAA have explained why the GPA plans will not be brought forward for debate at Congress next month in Carlow.
The GAA Director-General Paraic Duffy addressed the issue yesterday in Croke Park by identifying the flaws in the players organisation’s proposals.
“I’m making those points at length because some of the criticism we’ve got in the last few weeks in relation to this is that the GPA did not get a fair hearing,” inisted Duffy.
“It got a really fair hearing and they’re the reasons why, it did not fit with the three principles that had been established at the meeting on the 18th of December.”
There were four problems with the GPA proposal:
1. Doubling championship games
“The first thing was it would double the number of championship games.”
“You’d go from 61 to 116. So clearly you cannot have a principle that says we want to protect the club game and then turn around and recommend a proposal that increases the number of championship games.”
2. More lopsided games
“Under the system advocated by the GPA, you have the interprovincial championships, which would be over in May, and then you start the All-Ireland championship with all 32 counties in it with eight groups of four.”
“A Division One team in each group, Division Two, Division Three and Division Four, which meant, let’s face it, we’re going to have more one-sided games because every one of those groups would have a Division One team playing a Division Four team.
“That is actually created more one-sided games than we have at the moment and the initial debate was about reducing the number of one-sided games.”
3. The problem with round-robin games
“It would dilute the knockout aspect of the championship. The problem was, you’re going to play 48 round robin games, at the end of which only eight teams would be eliminated.
“You still have 24 teams left having played the 48 games. The history of the GAA with round robin has not been good.
“It doesn’t seem to excite our supporters or our fan base and I think it was a valid point for CCC to make that this wouldn’t work.”
4. No reward for provincial champions
“The other concern they had was the provincial championship would end in early May and there was a sense that there’s no great reward for winning the provincial championship.
“The seedings for the All-Ireland series were based on the National league, so the National league would be far more important in terms of your championship situation.
“There was some sort of little reward if you finished in the first pool, the first seeds, you would have home advantage when you played the second seed.
“If you won a provincial championship and you weren’t one of the National league seeds, you could then be moved into the top group of eight, that’s all.
“They were fairly marginal. The feeling, again, was that would really downgrade the provincial championships.”
To be fair Pauric Duffy makes plenty of valid points about the GPA’S ideas not being good enough….more one sided games we don’t need and MOST importantly clubs would suffer even more
Agree with joe brolly that Jim mcguinness’s plan was the best option, his plan linked the league, provincial and all Ireland championships into a truly exciting season at all levels. but out of all the exciting ideas put forward, I can’t believe they have brought the Tommy murphy mark 2 to congress, basically they’ve gone with the lamest idea on the table. No Duffy has the cheek to say if this rubbish doesn’t get passed we should just accept the status quo. Typical of the top brass in the GAA at the moment, lacking any real vision.
How about trying the old way for a few years again, you get beat, your out. That would put the bite back in it.
Straight knockout is ridiculous given the training schedules these days, it’s more games needed, not less.
I don’t necessarily think more games is the answer. The same number of games but more competitive is the way to go. More games would be a nightmare on club players
dont agree, it’s not the number of matches holding up club games, it’s the 5 week gaps between games and county managers not releasing players in those gaps that is killing the club game, almost every county player interviewed wants more game and less endless training. fans want to goto more games. But do agree that as a dublin fan, of both codes, i want to see dublin playing the top counties, not a winning a turket shoot.
Lots of strong points there from Padraic. 116 games in the year would be scandalous.
The GAA prides itself on its democracy but they’re brazenly denying and chance of democratic debate on this issue, which those playing the game at the highest level favour.
The GAA appear happy to put their head in the sand until the GPA grows a pair or the fixtures fiasco blows up in everybody’s face.
Every system has its flaws unfortunately. A two tier system is probably the best option but would never be accepted by most counties. The club system runs a tiered championship so why shouldn’t inter county?? You can put forward the argument that any county can put a competitive team of 15 players out but it really doesn’t seem to be the case. Tough decisions needed because the current champion consists of three competitive games, semis and final while most of the rest are usually non fixtures