Updated at 20.20
EXETER WILL RETAIN their Chiefs branding but will “retire” club mascot ‘Big Chief’ following a board review.
An Exeter supporters’ online petition had gathered more than 3,500 signatures, calling for an end to the club’s “harmful imagery and branding”.
Two more petitions have been launched arguing against any change however, with club fans split over whether the Chiefs Native American imagery carries offence.
But now after a lengthy board meeting on Wednesday, Exeter have opted to retain their Chiefs moniker.
The board took the view that the use of the Chiefs logo was in fact highly respectful,” read an Exeter statement.
“It was noted over the years we have had players and coaches from around the world with a wide range of nationalities and cultures.
“At no time have any players, coaches or their families said anything but positive comments about the branding or culture that exists at the club.
The one aspect which the board felt could be regarded as disrespectful was the club’s mascot ‘Big Chief’ and as a mark of respect have decided to retire him.”
American Football’s three-time Super Bowl winners Washington Redskins recently dropped their badge and branding, taking on the temporary new name of Washington Football Team.
Reigning Super Bowl champions Kansas City Chiefs have also been criticised for using Native American imagery and the “tomahawk chop” chant at Arrowhead Stadium.
Baseball’s Cleveland Indians dropped their mascot in 2018, later indicating they could also change their name.
Explaining Exeter’s review process, Chiefs bosses revealed they had sought testimony from all those offering contrasting views on the club’s branding.
Exeter insist the Chiefs nickname has its roots in the Devon area.
“The Exeter Rugby Club board today underwent a detailed review of the club’s branding following issues raised by the group Exeter Chiefs 4 Change,” read the club statement.
“The process has included looking into lengthy submissions from those who wish to see immediate change and from those who are content that the current branding is not disrespectful to indigenous groups.
“A detailed dossier of all evidence was compiled ahead of today’s meeting and was seen by all members of the board and reviewed.
Part of the club’s review has seen the club engage with its sponsors and key partners to seek their views – and they have also listened to the response of our supporters, the wider rugby community and certain sections from the Native American community, all of whom have provided us with detailed observations in letters, emails, social content and videos.
“Content provided to the board indicated that the name Chiefs dated back into the early 1900s and had a long history with people in the Devon area.”
Originally published at 18.13
The42 is on Instagram! Tap the button below on your phone to follow us!
I don’t like him.
@GARFARKLE: How well do you know him?
@GARFARKLE: I’d very much doubt he cares
@GARFARKLE: his job is to score goals not be your best mate..and he’s one of the best in the business at hitting the back of the net
@Macca: As well as you know him.
@Jamie: I couldn’t care less if he does.
@Barry Evans: Your Point?
@GARFARKLE: Good thing that no one gives a f”uk whether you like him or not.
@AM: You must as you are so upset.
I said I don’t like him.
@GARFARKLE: Cheer up princess.