COMING INTO THIS 2024/25 campaign, club players would have had a reminder from their coaches and analysts that there had been a notable change to the offside law.
World Rugby closed the โDupont Lawโ in July by permanently changing the lawbook.
Antoine Dupont and France had led a clever tactic that took advantage of a loophole regarding players being offside after a team-mate had kicked the ball. If you want a reminder of what France and others were doing, read this piece. It created some farcical situations.
From the July Tests onwards, that loophole was shut for good following a successful trial in Super Rugby.
In essence, this means a defender canโt be put onside when the opposition receiver of a kick runs five metres or passes the ball, as was the case before. As importantly, World Rugby also specified that offside defenders โmust make an attempt to retreatโ and get onside.
The idea was to create space for counter-attacks and reduce extended โkick tennis.โ
Recent evidence underlines that this change has been successful. Letโs take an example from Leicesterโs Premiership clash with Bath.
The passage starts with Bath out-half Finn Russell missing touch from a penalty.
Leicester fullback Freddie Steward fields the ball and responds by launching a massive kick down into Bathโs 22.
This sends Russell racing back to gather the ball as Leicester wing Ollie Hassell-Collins hares upfield in pursuit of Stewardโs kick, bringing all his team-mates onside as he does so.
Having had to work back, Russell doesnโt have much of an option other than to kick back out of his 22. With all but one of Russellโs team-mates ahead of him, he really needs to find touch but he misses again.
And now this is where we see the change in offside law coming into effect.
With Steward also having chased his own kick, itโs Leicester scrum-half Jack van Poortvliet who catches Russellโs clearance.
Under the old law, the Leicester man would have had potential tacklers much closer to him.
The Bath players marked in red below would have been able to hold their ground exactly where they were at this moment.
The three players in yellow would have had to get behind their own 10-metre line but they would then also have been entitled to hold their ground there, being 10 metres downfield from where van Poortvliet caught the ball.
If van Poortvliet had caught the ball and run five metres, all those Bath players would have been put onside and, therefore, been able to tackle him.
However, the law change means that now every one of these offside Bath players has to make an โeffort to retreatโ and get onside to avoid being penalised. They legally cannot โloiterโ in an offside position.
As soon as Russell kicks, referee Craig Maxwell-Keys is roaring to the Bath players, โRetreat, keep retreating, keep retreating!โ
Van Poortvliet understands and fully exploits the situation, accelerating into space as the Bath players retreat.
This is a new sight in rugby and exactly the kind of situation World Rugby wanted to create.
As has always been the case, Russell can bring team-mates onside by running upfield ahead of them but as we see below, heโs relatively slow to chase his kick.
Russell does bring a number of his team-mates onside but van Poortvliet is able to bypass many of the Bath players untouched.
By the time Bath make contact with him, itโs a panicked situation and tighthead prop Will Stuart is stretching to reach him, giving up penalty advantage for a high tackle.
Leicester keep playing at pace on top of Bath and two phases later, with the defence still reeling, itโs van Poortvliet who seals the deal by dummying and sniping through to score.
This try would not have been possible only a few months ago before the law changed.
Some of those Bath defenders upfield of Russellโs kick would have stood their ground and been able to tackle van Poortvliet after he had run five metres.
The fact that those players can no longer remain stationary and must make an effort to retreat is a big shift.
The consequences of failing to retreat can be severe, as Australia learned during their heavy Rugby Championship defeat to Argentina last month. With that game still in the balance, the Wallabies gave up an avoidable offside penalty.
Again, thereโs an exchange of kicks as the Australians initially attempt a 50:22 through centre Hamish Stewart.
Argentinaโs Santiago Carreras does an excellent job of turning back to field the ball, then he delivers a long kick down into Wallabies territory.
As soon as Carreras kicks, referee Pierre Brousset roars at the Argentina players in front of the kicker.
โRetreat, retreatโฆ keeping moving!โ shouts Brousset, looking directly at centre Santiago Chocobares upfield and we can see that the Pumas player does so, making an effort to bring himself back onside.
So play continues as the Wallabies look to deal with Carrerasโ kick.
Fullback Andrew Kellaway scoops the ball up and passes infield to out-half Ben Donaldson, who kicks back at the Pumas.
And this is where the Wallabies err.
Again, Brousset immediately roars a warning after the kick.
โGold, run back, retreat, retreat,โ he shouts but Wallabies scrum-half Jake Gordon doesnโt do so.
Gordon stands still, holding his position upfield of Donaldson.
The two players closest to Gordon, wing Marika Koroibete and centre Len Ikitau, arenโt making an huge effort to retreat either, although they seem to take at least one step back downfield.
Gordon appears to have his hands up in an attempt to indicate heโs holding his ground, but that doesnโt suffice any more.
So as Argentina fullback Juan Cruz Mallรญa fields Donaldsonโs kick and runs back at the Wallabies, we can see Brousset indicating the penalty advantage.
โAdvantage, never moved back, number nine,โ says Brousset and Gordon appears to be confused.
The advantage comes to nothing so Brousset blows his whistle and says, โNumber nine, you have to move back.โ
And then the damage of the offence hits home as Brousset tells Argentina captain Juliรกn Montoya, โCaptain, youโve got the penalty here [pointing down to where Gordon held his position] or the scrum at the kick [pointing to where Donaldson kicked from].โ
This relates to Law 10.4 which outlines sanctions for players being offside in front of a team-mate who has kicked the ball. The non-offending team can choose either a penalty at the place of infringement or a scrum where the offending team last played the ball.
The Pumas opt for the five-metre scrum. They win a scrum penalty at the first set-piece, decide to scrum again, then score a try off it.
With the conversion added, the Pumas suddenly open up clear space on the scoreboard with a 31-20 lead and they never look back from there.
There have been a few instances of teams and players adjusting to this change in law early on in the URC season.
Take this example from Connachtโs win over the Sharks.
Wing Shane Jennings kicks for Connacht and referee Federico Vedovelli immediately starts shouting, โRetreat, retreatโ to the Connacht players in front of Jennings.
We can see that most of them make an effort to do so, but Vedovelli penalises flanker Conor Oliver.
Oliver does initially retreat.
But then Oliver turns around and begins to move forward before Jennings [yellow below] has been able to bring him onside.
Vedovelliโs arm goes up for the penalty advantage.
โAdvantage, seven [Oliver] never retreats,โ says the referee.
The advantage goes nowhere and Vedovelli blows his whistle before addressing Oliver directly.
โSeven, never moving backwards, offside.โ
While thatโs not entirely true, with Oliver initially having retreated, the Connacht man did then advance before being brought onside. Oliver is probably unfortunate that Jennings slices his kick here, meaning it flies out towards where Oliver is positioned, bringing focus onto him, but itโs a lesson learned.
The Sharks opt for a shot at goal from inside their own half, with fullback Jordan Hendrikse hammering over the three points to extend their lead.
There was another interesting incident when Edinburgh were penalised against Leinster a week earlier.
After an exchange of kicks, Edinburgh clear the ball to touch.
Initially, the Edinburgh players upfield are retreating.
But as the ball finds touch, we can see that Edinburgh captain Jamie Ritchie begins to move forward even though he has not been brought onside.
Leinster fullback Jamie Osborne is taking a quick lineout to himself as Ritchie begins walking upfield.
As Osborne then decides to kick, Ritchie accelerates towards him looking for a blockdown.
Referee Andrea Piardi blows his whistle for a penalty against Edinburgh, telling Ritchie, โYou need to retreat.โ
Ritchie immediately appeals against the penalty, seemingly claiming that Piardi told the Edinburgh skipper he was OK to move forward.
โI was speaking to another one [player], sorry Jamie,โ responds Piardi. โOffside, in front of the kicker, never retreats.โ
Ritchie asks for further explanation.
โYou were looking at me,โ he says to Piardi. โI asked you โAre we good?โ and you said โYes.โ
โNo,โ responds Piardi, โI was speaking to another one.โ
Leinster kick their penalty to touch and Piardi jogs after Ritchie.
โIโm sorry for the confusion, I wasnโt speaking to you,โ says Piardi before Ritchie tries another avenue.
โHe [Osborne] has moved five metres, so I can advance. It came back on the pitch,โ says Ritchie.
โItโs the new rule,โ says Piardi. โYou need to retreat and be put back onside, even if we have a quick throw. Itโs the new rule.โ
Itโs an instructive example as Piardiโs explanation underlines that the law change still applies even when thereโs a quickly-taken lineout involved.
The closing of the old โDupont Lawโ loophole is an aspect of the game that referees have been asked to put additional focus on once again coming into the November Tests.
World Rugby are keen that match officials nail these decisions in the biggest games next month to ensure that coaches and players are no longer looking for shortcuts.
Itโs understood that the onus will mostly be on offside players close to the kicking player, demanding that they make a clear effort to retreat.
While match officials may be more understanding of players on the opposite side of the pitch to the kick at least remaining stationary, the safest bet for anyone in front of the kicker is to retreat and get themselves onside as quickly as possible.
The Dupont Law is dead.
Good piece Ciaran, sums us Mayoโs up to a tee.
It will be an epic, be it an epic fail or victory for the Red and Green.
Donegal all the way man
This study has clearly shown, that, based on the proportion of red to green thumbs, twice as many Mayo fans read the Journal than Donegal fansโฆ.time to blow the pr budget on the advertising in Donegalโฆ.
MAYO for SAM, donegal for catch!!!
we can do thisโฆ maigh eo abuโฆ :-D
Evokes memories of childhood back home going to those galway matchs โ great article! Weโre just hoping they can do it, the hype of 1996/1997 has long since passed โ Kerryโs cruelty in 04 & 06 put paid to that craze! Losing is unthinkable, but a rational person would have to pick Donegal to win I suppose. But maybe, just maybe Mayo are building quietly to a cresendo this year , and maybe Donegal peaked against Cork and the hype in that county is getting to the players (Apparently thousands turning up to training sessions!?). Surely that has to weigh on these players, no matter how much theyโre drilled by Jimmy. Mayo have been in this situation before, hopefully that counts for something?
Am I clutching at straws? Once bitten, twice shy but F~ck it โ MAYO FOR SAM!
Here is a bag of straws! :)
Last time GB won an open in the Tennis was 1936.
Andy Murray won the open in 2012.
On Sept 23rd 1936 the AI was contested between Mayo and Laois.
On Sept 23rd 2012 the AI will be contested between Mayo and Donegal.
A certain Henry Kenny (RIP) played that day, father of an Taoiseach.
Mayo came out as winners of the AI, their first. :)
Up mayo
who ever is victorious in this one, there wont be a cow milked for a month will the celebrations that will be had and many a person will be conceived because of Sam going north or west!!
Jimmyโs winning matches, Jimmyโs winning games. Donegal for Sam, Mayo for sandwiches.
Great piece Ciaran.
Maybe the famine ends Sunday?
Up Donegal!!!!!
Brighid, see ya outside coppers at about half 4 Sunday morningโฆ Iโll have a mayo jersey on and a big smileโฆ. Iโll take you for a snack box then weโll had back to mineโฆ sound??
I donโt think there has ever been a piece written that mentions St Jarlaths and Milltown so many times without mentioning John Scan Concannon โฆ. could you not of stuck it in some how Murf ??
From a corkman, COME ON MAYO!!!!
Lmao fartbox, thanks but no thanks! Only one man for me-a Donegal one. There will be plenty of good looking Donegal dolls about coppers Iโm sure. Go on Donegal ;)
โIโve said in this column before I believe that no All-Ireland final in the 128-year history of the GAA has thrown up a pairing as emotive and unique as this oneโ
I dunno about that. In 1998 Galway & Kildare hadnโt won the All-Ireland in 102 years between them, compared to a mere 81 this time. That made it fairly emotional & unique. Imagine the emotion in Kildare after waiting 70 years & beating the three previous All-Ireland winners, including Mickoโs win over Kerry.
The โ89 hurling final was certainly unique & emotional. It involved Tipp ending their All-Ireland famine against a team who had grown up hurling against the backdrop of the Troubles when, as Terence McNaughten said (Iโm paraphrasing), walking to training with a hurl in your hand essentially put a target on your back. Wexford and Limerick were fairly into it in 1996 but that didnโt seem like such a big deal after the dam of emotion that burst in 1995. And what about the first all Munster final in 1997? Mutual loathing, the haves vs the have-nots, the countryโs first taste of the back door โ the lot!
Whatโs the big deal this time? Mayo have lost a few big games? Well boo-hoo, at least they got there. If they played in a tougher province then theyโd have been culled before they got to the big stage in a lot of those years. A ratio of 3 All-Irelands from 51 Provincial titles tells itโs own story on that front. Losing some matches hardly compares to Tyroneโs emotional state in 2005.
Still, thanks for coming
Put us in a tough province then. Weโll happily go in. Or better still put the so called weaker counties in connacht, they wouldnโt have a hope of winning it. Leinster is full of weak teams and is a 2 team challenge-same as connacht. Ulster is a one county championship most of the time, or sometimes 2-same as connacht.
Munster with just cork and Kerry is the hardest province there is. So whatโs your point?
When mayo get out of connacht they have to play teams from other provinces and quite often beat them. We beat the all Ireland champions 2 years in a row, is that because we have it easy?
Tomas, the Ulster Championship is far more competitive than itโs counterparts in Connacht and Leinster. It has very rarely been won by the same county back to back. Donegal made history when we lifted it this year, our 2nd is as many years, that win broke a record. That says it all.
I think throughout this season people have written off Donegal. They all said weโd never beat Tyrone and then we did, then they said weโd never beat Down and then we did, then they said weโd never beat Kerry and then we did, then they said weโd definitely get sent home by cork and we ran rings around them in the 2nd, albeit we dropped the ball towards the end, but weโve no fear of being underdogs. Weโve spent the entire season proving the country wrong. We like a challenge and Iโve no doubt that Jim and the boys will prove everyone wrong again on Sunday. Thereโs only one place Samโs going on Sunday and thatโs to the fair hills of Donegal! Dรบn na nGรกll abรบ!
Yeah except youโre not underdogs this time around! Its all different now, no critics to prove wrong, the weight of expectation on your shoulders. Youโd nearly prefer Dublin to have something to aim at, but its Mayo, and weโre in your position now, underdogs, hungry to prove teh pundits wrong. Its going to be interesting thats for sure!
MAYO FOR SAM!