Advertisement
We now know what they were doing. Sort of. CBS Screenshot

The Colts have finally explained what went on with one of the worst plays in NFL history

And it makes their head coach look really bad.

ON SUNDAY NIGHT, the Indianapolis Colts ran one of the strangest โ€” and worst โ€” plays in recent NFL history when they isolated their entire offensive line out to the right of the field, leaving just two in the middle.

Colt Anderson was immediately swamped by New England Patriots players and the Colts turned over the football giving their opponents great field position.

The Pats eventually won the game by 7 points.

A lot of thoughts went through our minds when this happened. Most of it involved swearing.

Now the Colts have finally offered an explanation for what they were trying to do and, to nobodyโ€™s surprise, it didnโ€™t pan out the way they hoped it would.

Indeed, the play started to go wrong before it was even called.

SB Nation SB Nation

Punter Pat McAfee told the Bob & Tom Radio Show:

โ€œThe gunner (the player who chases the ball after it has been punted) who became the center all week was Clayton Geathers. Clayton Geathers gets injured in the second quarter.

โ€œInsert Griff Whalen who had never done it before. So Griff Whalen is now the new center in a play heโ€™s never practised before.โ€

Basically, they shouldnโ€™t have called the play because the player who had the most important role in it was injured at the time.

McAfee also confirmed what the intention of the play was.

โ€œThe point of the play is a deception play. So, youโ€™re trying to manipulate the (receiving team) into thinking they have to sub their defence back on.

โ€œWe are sprinting to the sideline in hopes to make the other team think we are subbing our offence back onto the field. So, when they think the offence is coming back on the field, your hope is that they think their defence has to come back on the field.โ€

After deciding to run the play anyway, the Colts were hoping to trick the Patriots into doing one of three things: 1) Call a time out, 2) give away a penalty for having too many players on defence or 3) leave the middle of the field empty for an easy run as the players all ran towards the sideline.

Unfortunately for the Colts, none of these things happened so โ€” as he hadnโ€™t practised the play before โ€” Whalen failed to realise he was not supposed to snap the ball.

SB Nation SB Nation

If the Patriots didnโ€™t do any of the three things above, the center was supposed to โ€˜fakeโ€™ snap the football โ€” a hard count โ€” in one final bid to draw the defence offside. If that didnโ€™t work, the Colts would just take the delay of game penalty and punt the ball away as normal.

Though he didnโ€™t practise the play all week, Whalen is not without blame here. Scott Zolak reports that Anderson told him repeatedly not to snap the football.

Still, the vast majority of blame should fall on Chuck Pagano who allowed his team run a play where the most important component of it had no clue what was going on.

So shouldnโ€™t he have asked โ€œwhyโ€™d I call that?โ€ rather than โ€œwhyโ€™d you snap that?โ€ after the play?

SB Nation SB Nation

Irish Sports Council threaten to review IABA funding after Walsh controversy

OBJโ€™s insane windmill catch was the best bit of the Giantsโ€™ forgettable night

Close
Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Kelly
    Favourite John Kelly
    Report
    May 27th 2022, 11:10 PM

    Dropped so many points from winning positions so farโ€ฆ Could literally be at the top with a better conversion rate but thatโ€™s the way, still positive weโ€™re getting into good positions just not hanging on to them enough. We keep trucking on!! Mon Bohs

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Moran
    Favourite James Moran
    Report
    May 28th 2022, 6:43 AM

    @John Kelly: time for change long gone stale

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Kelly
    Favourite John Kelly
    Report
    May 28th 2022, 11:59 AM

    @James Moran: maybeโ€ฆ Still think heโ€™s the right man, itโ€™s hard when you have to replace 60% of the team year on year but most on longer contracts now so hopefully can build next year instead of another clear out.. thatโ€™s the key for me. Bit of stability

    2
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.