THE FOLLOWING PASSAGE is an extract from The Billionaires Club.
Football in the 21st century is unrecognisable from the working-class game that captivated and captured the world in the 20th. Sky and BT paid over £5 billion for the 2016–19 three-year Premier League broadcasting deal. Once foreign rights sales are taken into account, that figure rises to above £8 billion.
The sale of the English league’s foreign rights alone are comparable to the entire TV rights deals of Spain, Germany and Italy. The 2016–19 deal will likely secure just as much. In comparison, the Premier League’s first five-year contract signed with BSkyB in 1992 was for £191.5 million, less than 4% of the 2016–19 deal.
Less than three decades earlier, the game was very different. The story of 15 April 1989, Hillsborough – the 96 Liverpool fans who died in a stadium crush during the FA Cup semi-final against Nottingham Forest; the Taylor Report, which painted a picture of a dilapidated game housed in decrepit, crumbling, Victorian stadiums where supporters were treated little better than cattle; and the subsequent rebranding of the game that would consign football’s negative image to the past – has been well documented elsewhere.
But 1989 also saw a year of seismic political and social upheaval that would go on to play an important role in football’s economic evolution. In November of that year the Berlin Wall finally fell, which marked the beginning of the end of Europe’s communist partition, the disintegration of the Soviet Union and what seemed to be total victory for free-market capitalism and liberal democracy over state-dictated socialism.
It was dubiously dubbed the ‘end of history’ by political theorists like Francis Fukuyama, and marked a fundamental shift in the global economy, the roots of which had been laid by the free-market economics of Margaret Thatcher in the UK and Ronald Reagan in the US that preached the gospel of privatisation and deregulation. The fall of the Berlin Wall brought freedom to millions but also heralded a period of plunder unseen in modern times. It handed the opportunity to a group of businessmen to take advantage of the chaos to make fortunes in an opaque fashion. It gave rise to the oligarchs – a Greek word that approximates to ‘rule by the few’ but which is largely now used in relation to Russian business figures connected to the country’s political elite.
Around the world, the post-communist economic settlement accelerated a system of privatisations and deregulations that concentrated wealth and increased inequality, whether in the United Kingdom or Russia.
As the historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Boston Globe after the election of US president Donald Trump: ‘Back in 1989, we thought we were witnessing the triumph of capitalism and liberal democracy. Alas, we were wrong. It turns out the winners were oligarchy and the populism that legitimises it.’
Millionaires became billionaires, and football, in particular the Premier League, was in the right place at the right time to benefit from the largesse of this new class of super-rich.
Within years the Premier League model was being frantically copied, with minor cultural tweaks, everywhere from Australia to the US to India, attracting a new breed of club owner, one that had been largely unseen in world football until the mid-1990s: members of the super-rich with little or no local connection to the club they had bought, who, at best, possessed hazy motives and even hazier pasts.
By the end of 2016 foreign owners had bought, or held significant shares in, 15 of the Premier League’s 20 teams. Dozens more, from Charlton to Blackpool, had bought clubs further down the league pyramid.
But more important than nationality was wealth. 14 billionaires from Russia, Iran, China, Thailand, the UAE, Germany and Switzerland, the US and the UK now had a say in the fates of Arsenal, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Everton, Leicester City, Manchester United, Manchester City, Liverpool, Sunderland, Stoke City, Southampton and Tottenham. And it wasn’t just in England.
In France, Paris Saint-Germain had been bought by Qatar Sports Investments, an investment vehicle funded by the Qatari state. Qatar was now one of the richest countries – when judged by GDP per capita – on earth.
Other investments had spanned the globe, with money from Sheikh Mansour connecting Manchester City to New York City FC to Melbourne City FC. Clubs in the Netherlands, Italy, France and the UK had been bought by Chinese billionaires.
How and where they made their money was often unknown. It wasn’t that big spending hadn’t existed before. Jack Walker pumped his many millions into buying his beloved Blackburn Rovers the Premier League title in 1995, while Mohamed al Fayed sunk anywhere up to £200 million into turning third division Fulham into a Premier League club.
What had changed was the scale of the resources needed to compete, along with the internationalisation of the investors. Gone were the days that Manchester United could be controlled by a successful local butcher, as Louis Edwards had done when he took control of the club in 1964.
Now only plutocrats, oligarchs, royalty and global captains of industry need apply, untethered from geographical constraints.
The Billionaires Club is not really about the business of football, although it touches on it. Nor is it about the football business, as such. It is about the new Masters of the Universe that have now made football their business.
The book began life wanting to ask questions that are rarely answered. Who is this new breed of super-rich football club owner? Where and how did they make their huge fortunes, now being funnelled into the wage packets of £200,000-a-week footballers? And, most puzzlingly of all, why did they decide to sink huge portions of their vast fortunes into football in the first place?
In essence, how did a former rubber duck salesman from Moscow, turned owner of Chelsea, rise to become one of Vladimir Putin’s most trusted oligarchs? Why would a quiet, unknown member of the Abu Dhabi royal family ‒ an absolute monarchy permitting little freedom of speech and built on the back of dwindling oil revenue and virtual indentured slavery ‒ decide to buy a mid-table English club? Why does a slew of Chinese consortiums suddenly own all the clubs in the West Midlands?
By visiting their home countries, their businesses and the clubs they have bought, we can begin to build a picture of what football’s future might look like in this brave, sometimes frightening new world.
‘The Billionaires Club’ by James Montague is published by Bloomsbury Sport. More info here.
Gleeson needs to grow a few more brain cells and quit launching crazy needless long range shots, other than that he has to potential to emulate Ken McGrath, and that’s saying a lot
Put what Gleeson has been doing in context of a Waterford side who half the time had no one in the final third. I don’t think there’s been a more skilful and impressive player than Austin gleeson this year.
James
He needs to mature, there were times against Kilkenny in both matches were he took on way too much, he has the ability to be the best player in the country and if he adjusts this flaw he will be, however he is not quite there yet.
Totally agree he needs to mature. That wasn’t my point. My point is that I think he’s been the most skilful player this year.
Dunno about skill per se, he’s an unbelievable athlete and serious fielder of the ball with a super engine but Callanan’s point yesterday where he took the ball down with the hurley was the skill-laden cherry on top of an all round display
James watch Gleason’s performance against Wexford. I have never seen a player hit so many balls into the middle of nowhere and racking up wides like they were gone out of fashion. To a lesser extent he was like that in every match this year so while exception at times someone who was so wasteful and reckless at times does not deserve player of the year.
It will be callinan or p maher(wing back)
When was the last time a player who didn’t play in the final get player of the year
2007, Dan shanahan,
Remember it now. He scored a heap that year
Can we call a spade a spade here and realise that callanan before the final was very inconsistent. Definitely incredible in the final, definitely man of the match but definitely not player of the year.
Seamie all day. He has consistently been the most dangerous and effective scorer in the country for the last 3 seasons. Given enough service he is essentially unplayable, even on the rare quiet days like the Galway semi he still provides a focal point for the attack and a telling contribution in winning the game. Factor that almost every other team in country ,with the exception of KK, essentially tailor their game plan to stopping him, sometimes putting 2/3 players on him.
Never read such spoof in my life. There’s literally nothing factual in your comment.
Actually most of what he said was right, me thinks it’s you that’s doing the spoofing
Lads there’s an article down a couple scrolls about callanan being inconsistent!
While he was inconsistent in his early career, he was unfairly marginalised during Dec Ryan’s tenure, and in the last 3 seasons as a regular starter he has been the most devastating forward in the country in Championship proper (fact). The scoring statistics back this up, his nearest rivals TJ and Joe Show have been their teams free takers during this period, a role Seamie has only held intermittently. Cork, Limerick, Waterford detailed sweepers to play directly in front of him (fact), and anyone with eyes could see Daiti Burke was stuck to him in a semi (a great performance by Burke) even at the expense of ignoring the general play at times.
Has to be Callahan. Unplayable this year in fairness . We could not handle him in final and maybe no changes were made to halt him was because we had no one to handle on the field or on the bench .
Callanan
Wouldn’t say he was unplayable this year, Daithi Burke did a good job on him in the semi final
He still got the key play in, which was the pass for the goal, that won the day
Incidentally Austin Gleesons temperament is very suspect no one can question his ability but could and should have been sent off in both munster finals against tipp
Padraic Maher… the big hits, the physical fitness, the classy points, the last ditch tackles… made dung of canning with that shoulder, HOTY all day long boys
Wel call a spade a spade james nobody and i mean nobody has the scoring record from play of Seamie Callinan not T.j reid not Richie Hogan hes averaged 5 points from play this season and if you take the Galway match out of it where there was 2 men on him at all times its even more impressive. How in the name of god do you call that inconsistant… even against galway which he was carrying an injury into he still nailed all his frees and set up a peach of a goal
Callinan was not double marked against Galway. Daithi Burke was the only player marking him. Aidan Harte was sweeping across the full back line but was not double marking Callinan.
Seamus Callanan will win it well but Brendan Maher has put in some heroic shifts this year and deserves a lot of credit
154 votes for Hogan? Are you well at all.
Callanan for me.To score 9 points from play in an All Ireland final is special even if KK were poor on the day .
Gleeson will win it soon though.
In 20 years 13 forwards 5 backs and 2 middle of the field. It will be a forward scores win matches simple!
How could Austin get it didn’t touch a ball in munster final