IT TOOK US 33 minutes to actually see a scrum in Irelandโs win against Romania on Sunday, and when they started to flow, Ireland had little trouble coping with what their opponents had to throw at them.
Nathan White looked at ease fending off Andrei Ursache โ starting ahead of the more troublesome Mihai Lazar, while Cian Healy seemed to be gaining solid ground on veteran Paulica Ion.
However, with three of the four scrums Healy packed down for taking place on the far side of the television cameras, analysing his performance can only extend to the fact that he seemed to be moving forward.
Overall, it was another comfortable scrummaging performance, the fourth game in a row where Ireland have had a 100 percent success rate on their own put-in.
The stats for Irish scrum coach Greg Feek make for exceptional reading. From their last eight games, theyโve lost just one of 48 scrums when theyโve had the put-in, while theyโve retained possession on 63 of their 68 scrums in 2015 so far.
But while it all looks healthy scrum-wise from an Irish point of view, on a global scale the scrum has reached crisis point. Players are constantly bending the rules, and referees are being reduced to guesswork, which is disastrous for the game when stakes are so high.
The most obvious and โ strangely โ most ignored scrum offence these days appears to be the angle of the loosehead.
Since the removal of the hit from the scrum, the jostling for position is no longer there, and it allows the loosehead to wait for his moment, and angle his drive straight across his opponent.
It became a major talking point after Saturday nightโs game between England and Wales, and while Joe Marler was the man to come in for particular attention, itโs going unpunished in almost every game so far in the tournament.
The two scrums that were under scrutiny crucially yielded six points in the way of English penalties, and both looked to have been poor decisions by referee Jerome Garces, who deemed that Wales were wheeling the scrum.
As we can see below from the excellent overhead cameras at Twickenham, Joe Marler has turned in at an angle on Tomas Francis to send the scrum sideways, tricking Garces into thinking that Wales were wheeling the set-piece around.
The movement of the scrum sparked a good debate between former England hooker Brian Moore and former test referee Jonathan Kaplan on Monday, about who initiated the angle; Marler or Francis.
Kaplan sad that Marler had made the first move, while Moore pointed out that if Tomas Francis had tried to angle in, the physical nature of the scrum means Marler has to follow, whether he wants to or not.
What Moore points out is crucial. Because of the way players form at the scrum, if one player drives in at an angle, his opposition prop will have to follow.
But by looking at the body positions of the scrums, it does appear that Marler. initiates the angle.
We can see below the moment that the angle appears. While Francisโ shoulders have been squeezed in at an angle, his hips are still square, but Marler has stepped out to attack him and bore in.
The scrums made for grim viewing on Saturday night, and the โCheatfestโ from both sides was well summed up by Green and Gold Rugby, who are taking an extra special interest in both England and Wales in the coming weeks.
Iโm keen to stress that boring into a scrum is not exclusively a Joe Marler problem. Marcos Ayerza of Argentina is often called the best loosehead in the world, and heโs notorious for driving in on the angle.
He won a crucial penalty five metres from his own line against New Zealand in the opening round of matches, and it was all down to the way he drove across Owen Franksโ body, sending the scrum across the pitch, rather then forward.
Itโs something weโve written about on The42 lot in the last few months, and itโs happening right across the board. Ayerza did it during the Rugby Championship, as did Tony Woodcock in numerous games. Australiaโs James Slipper has been at it, and in the first World Cup warm-up between Wales and Ireland both Nicky Smith and Dave Kilcoyne chanced their arm by driving perpendicular to the scrum. On most of those occasions, it was ignored by the referee and in some cases won their sides a penalty.
I could sit here and list the offenders forever, but the reality is that the scrum has become a free-for-all. Simply blaming the referee for not penalising it achieves nothing. The scrum has become such a mess that every stakeholder in the game has to share the blame.
World Rugby havenโt given the referees adequate help and training on the set-piece. The referees are then playing guessing games, and giving the majority of decisions to the team that appears to be going forward. The teams know it, and will thus scrap the rules in favour of go-forward ball and the chance of an easy penalty. The grassroots coaches see how scrums are going on TV, and show it to the kids. And then the cycle continues.
The first step to improving things has to come from World Rugby. Their influence needs to seep down through the game. They had the perfect chance to when they listed the new experimental law changes, but instead they danced around the issue.
They knew that scrums were becoming a problem with far too much time wasted on collapses and resets, but rather than trying to identify whatโs going wrong with the scrum, theyโve instead chosen to reduce the amount of scrums per game.
But crucially, reducing the amount of collapsed scrums is not the same as reducing the amount of scrums that collapse.
They made a point of targeting crooked feeds in the law changes, because itโs what TV analysts complain about after every single game. The cheating that goes on inside the scrum is ignored, and until it is scrutinised, nothing will ever be done about it.
While the removal of the hit by World Rugby in 2013 has made an enormous impact (I recently watched back a game from the 2011 World Cup and really had forgotten just how bad things were), player safety is still a major concern.
A quick search of the World Cup squads of the major nations at this tournament show that Ireland, England, Wales, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa all have at least one front row player in their squads that have undergone neck surgery since the start of 2014.
Further to that, Argentinaโs Maximiliano Bustos was forced to retire with a herniated disc in his neck 12 months ago, Hika Elliot โ who missed out on New Zealand selection โ has had ongoing neck problems over the last two years, Scotlandโs Fraser Brown had neck surgery earlier in his career, while Tendai Mtawarira of South Africa was lucky enough to avoid neck surgery last year, but did spend time out of the game nursing an injury.
The number of front rows with neck problems is not just a coincidence, and itโs the attitude towards them thatโs most worrying. Describing the collapsed scrum that resulted in his own neck surgery in 2014 (the second neck surgery heโd had in three years), Welsh hooker Ken Owens described it as โa freak injuryโ.
When the scrum has descended into a contest to make your opponent fall head-first into the ground, thereโs nothing โfreakโ about that injury.
The only hope is that something is done about it, before another โfreakโ injury happens in a major televised game.
They wonโt be long reacting after that.
Marler is angled in at the bind every time, but if he isnโt punish then who can blame him.
Well written piece. Far too many injured front rows !
This is why I think there may be a case for a specialist scrum ref to be employed. The scrum is a very technical and potentially dangerous set piece and needs to be policed properly. It seems many of the current refs havenโt a notion what theyโre looking at and make calls based on that lack of knowledge.
The last thing we need is more officiating! We have assistant referees running for cover every time they are asked to make a call on any minor infringement deferring instead to TMOโs which can add several minutes to clock, extreme case Eng Fiji. Simplest answer is to make players police themselves. Yellow cards and even reds if necessary. Playing with seven man pack for 73 minutes is tough! Zero tolerance!
Good analysis done in the Ireland Wales warm up match where Jenkins and Paul James were boring in all day and getting rewarded penalties. Up to a ref to punish illegal play
Good piece. There certainly are some problems associated with the scrum. It seems to me that Ireland are one of the only sides who try to scrummage fairly (Wales are especially illegal in my view). Credit has to go to Schmidt and Feek for Irelandโs approach. Incidentally, most of the Ireland players who try to bend the rules are from Munster โ Kilcoyne and Archer like angling in, and James Cronin is a tricky customer.
Aside from looseheads pushing in at an angle, refs allowing too much pressure to come on before the ball is put in is big part of the problem. The packs shouldnโt be doing much more than leaning against each other before the ball is put in. If this was the case there would be much more scope for a hooking contest
One other thing is that they seem to have done away almost completely with turnovers for a scrum going through 90 degrees. If wheeling was allowed it would make teams less enthusiastic about trying to keep the ball in to win a penalty because there would be more of a danger of getting turned over. Whipping the scrum could be dangerous, so the tighthead actually pulling back shouldnโt be allowed, but saying that the scrum has to move forward before it can be turned seems random and illogical to me as it assumes that one side has complete control over how the scrum moves, which canโt really be the case
Great article. Andre Joubert is a controversial commentator but he often makes very good points. He is the only man to have referred two RWC finals and that did not happen by accident.
You mentioned players with neck injuries including NZโS Hika Elliot. He is a hooker, much less able to bore in, which implies that his issues may have been caused by opposing props boring in.
A large hole appears behind the boring in prop which may help to identify the offender. However I did notice that in the English hooker may be shuffling arround to cover this gap. This implies that this is a team tactics not an individualโs.
While others are praising the quality of the rugby at this word cup, sadly for me the feature of this yearโs tournament is the inconsistencies in the refereeing. I guess this implies again that all teams are pushing the envelope and the refereeing.
Whoops wrong SAF refโฆDโoh
Good piece and nanja your piece is total and utter scutter , How can a ref stop pressure coming on in a scrum when they set ? What yoke a chain on to the 2 packs and have the 2 touch judges pullin em to keep the pressure off