By Loic Tanzi
IN THE SPACE of 20 minutes of France’s comfortable 3-0 victory over Scotland on Saturday, Olivier Giroud summed up the paradox he poses for fans of Les Bleus as the country prepares for their attempt to win Euro 2016.
Shortly before the start of the match he finished his warm up practising his shooting with Didier Deschamps’ assistant Guy Stephane. There was nothing unusual about that, only the Arsenal man failed to find the target with any of his efforts on the goal of Benoit Costil, France’s third-choice keeper. As he fired the ball over and again, fruitlessly seeking the net, he smiled ruefully as fans at Metz’ Stade Saint-Symphorien looked on incredulous.
Everything changed when the real action started; within eight minutes the 29-year-old had scored a cheeky flick from a Bacary Sagna cross. Half an hour later he added a second, as he proved the outstanding influence in France’s comfortable win.
Over the last three weeks, Giroud has run the gambit of emotions. In Biarritz on May 17 he was part of a France team that was acclaimed in the southern region, better known for its rugby and therefore rarely seen by the national football team. But returning to Paris and the subsequent trip to Nantes proved terrible for the attacker. Persistently jeered, he became the scapegoat of the side – the price he has had to pay because of Karim Benzema’s absence, which has been deemed unjustified by a minority. Even his goal against Cameroon in a 3-2 success was accompanied by only moderate enthusiasm.
On Saturday morning though, the atmosphere was very different in front of the team hotel in Metz, when he signed autographs for a group of around 50 fans who had come to try and speak with their idols.
Nothing will change that fact that Giroud is a player set to divide opinion. But his double at the weekend will offer the forward some well-earned respite.
“It’s warmed my heart,” he admitted after the match. “But I never put too much pressure on myself after what happened in Nantes. I know how to distance myself from these things. It would be lying if if I said that it didn’t affect me. But I have bounced back on the pitch, and that’s the best response.”
Giroud’s most recent statistics with France are encouraging, with seven goals in his last five starts. He has scored in all of those matches, and only Karim Benzema can boast an equal record over the course of the last 10 years. Against Scotland he celebrated his fourth double for France in 49 matches; Benzema only has five in 81.
The Number 9 has many supporters, too. Speaking to Goal, Jerome Rothen, a Champions League finalist with Monaco in 2004, stated his belief that the forward’s record is formidable.
In France and elsewhere there are always critics,” he said. “Certain people feel that Benzema’s non-selection is due to Giroud, but even if Benzema was there, Giroud would have been on the list, too.
“Maybe he’s paying for an average season at Arsenal, but with France he’s always given everything, played well and scoring goals. What more can you ask of him? Nothing. So those jeering must stop.
For my part, I have confidence that he will continue to score goals and transform this negative energy into something positive before winning the public over. When you do that, there’s no sweeter victory.”
“Olivier has already responded to Nantes,” Deschamps said. “As Patrice Evra said, the players are united. When there is one in difficulty, they are all with him. Olivier was heckled, but that’s part of the job. I’ve confidence in him and his team-mates, too.
The coach is conscious of what Giroud can bring to the team. He has a unique profile among France’s attackers and on the field his link-up play is very important. All of the wingers used at the weekend systematically sought out Giroud to help them create breaches in the Scottish defence. But as the centre forward, he must do more than perform well with his back to goal; he must take chances, and against Scotland he did that perfectly.
Once again he proved that he’s very capable,” Sagna said. “Due to the criticism he’s received it’s not always easy to see, but he’s France’s forward.”
Giroud has shown he has the broad shoulders to assume the responsibility – and he won’t let one mediocre match weigh him down.
The42 is on Snapchat! Tap the button below on your phone to add!
Imagine if Paisley has managed.. and of course lived a bit longer. At least same or better success – and a more attractive way of doing it.
Big Jack wasn’t bad though! God be with the days… those halcyon days.
Would Paisley have gone after Aldridge and Houghton? Then Townsend later. We will never know but those 2 made a big difference
Jesus make me feel old!
I’m surprised you know how to use a computer.
Do you remember it?? I wonder what style of play they would have adopted if paisley was the manager. Thing is if you study the squad back then and the clubs they played for and the position of the clubs at the time it’s not hard to see how anyone with a bit of managerial noise could make something from them. A lot of quality throughout and some of it was world class. Brady for example (although he was on the slide), bonner was also arguably world class, McGrath was world class and one of europes finest defenders, Sheedy, Laurensen, beglin, Whelan etc etc. A great time for sure.
And then likes of Aldridge and Houghton who were with Oxford I think. Way down the divisions. Playing for Ireland opened opportunities in those days.
Charlton in hindsight you might say could have done better, But he started out with a group without belief. Great days generally.
Oxford were in the old first division in the 1985-86 season
Yes and they won the league (milk) cup that year
Paisley is the most underrated manager of all time. 3 European Cups in 5 years. When you think that the Brit’s knighted Ferguson despite he not being able to achieve that in nearly 30 years. Bizarre.
Jack would never walk away like Keane did. How things and values have changed in all the years, now the Irish promote and appoint a person who abandoned his team and his country. Jack would have done what Mick Mc Carthy did and let Keane piss off.
Jack did an incredible job and gave us many great day’s and memories. Can’t help but wonder how Bob Paisley would’ve done. One of the all time greats.
Bob would have had a great team to work with. Not knocking the lads we have now but it’s hard to think of any of them being in the same class. Maybe younger Irish lads now don’t get the same chances they once did to develop with big clubs across the sea.
He had us playing shyte football but what memories..
Two polar opposites as managers , Paisley was a very very astute football manager who learned from Shankly and then proceeded to take Liverpool to the Pinnacle of football . His famous quote after buying Kenny Dalglish from Celtic for 440 thousand pounds was , ” Lets get out of here before they realise what they have done ” , But Charlton was a better fit for that Irish team
Shankly wanted Jack to replace him at Anfield so his stock must have been fairly high even in the 70s.
Very good read
Very good article but Paisley didn’t win 6 titles in 7 years was 6 in 8 which is great considering the amount of different sides who won it in the years previous. Paisley won titles in 76,77,79,80,82,83. Forest and Villa broke their sequence in 78 and 81 respectively. They won it then under Fagan in 84 then Dalglish in 86,88 and 90. Thankfully they haven’t won it since
Time to get over this shite!win something for a change!!
matt you do know that would be impossible don’t you.
John Giles had his time as manager
Any truth in the long running story that Johnny Giles was in a hotel around the corner while the vote was taking place, all the time under the impression he was about to be announced as the next manager? Jack’s appointment was always believed to be another FAI calamity with Giles as the undeserving casualty at the time.
Should’a, would’a, could’a…… Bill$hit….
Yeah right….
Ok