Advertisement
Nam Y. Huh/AP/Press Association Images

These 5 maths and stats gurus are changing the way we understand sport

Here comes the science.

THE NEW YORK Timesโ€™ renowned statistician Nate Silver is moving his blog to ESPN.

This is a good thing for anyone who likes to read about sports.

But Silver comes into a sports writing field thatโ€™s already stacked with statistics-minded people. In politics, his adherence to math and modeling made him an exceptional figure. That wonโ€™t be the case at ESPN when he chooses to write about sports.

Here are a handful of writers who are doing some Silver-type sports writing already.

We excluded baseball writers because all baseball writing is stats-based now:

1. Kirk Goldsberry (NBA, Grantland). Heโ€™s a โ€œvisiting scholarโ€ at Harvard and does a lot of cool data visualization stuff with basketball shot charts โ€” showing where players take most of their shots, and how efficient they are from different areas on the court.

His extensive shot charting leads to interesting and specific revelations like, say, Martell Webster is insanely good from the right corner.

Or Nate Robinson is more efficient than youโ€™d think:

2. Kevin Pelton (NBA, Pro Basketball Prospectus and ESPN). He took over at ESPN for John Hollinger โ€” who invented ESPNโ€™s influential PER stat โ€” after the Grizzlies poached him. Pelton co-wrote the 2012-13 Pro Basketball Prospectus, which included win-loss projections for every team and player based on past performance and historical anecdotes.

Sports are notoriously hard to predict โ€” and Silver actually has a spotty track record when trying to predict sports โ€” but Pelton seeks to do just that.

He also writes more general articles about NBA stats, like last week when he looked at which statistics historically translate from Summer League to the NBA.

3. Ken Pomeroy (College basketball, KenPom.com). He has an advanced stats-based college basketball ranking system that is incredibly influential among college basketball fans and commentators.

College sports rankings are plagued by subjectivity. When you compare the KenPom rating to the traditional polls, you get a picture of which teams are overvalued and undervalued by humans.

He also has a blog where he runs the stats on questions like: Should teams foul up three at the end of games? Are two-for-ones at the end of halves always a good idea?

John Amis/AP/Press Association Images

4. Aaron Schatz (NFL, Football Outsiders). Schatz has combined game charting, predictive models, and an advanced stats rating system to form the best NFL statistics resource around with Football Outsiders.

His DVOA rating calculates a teamโ€™s efficiency relative to the league average, and itโ€™s an invaluable resource for comparing teams and match-ups.

His site also charts really specific plays and produces original stats that you simply donโ€™t get anywhere else (like everything in this worst cornerback rating).

Football Outsiders also has a paid service where it predicts results against the spread.

Credit: Brian Fremau.

5. Brian Fremeau (College football, BCF Toys and Football Outsiders). He does some data visualization, but he also does weekly game predictions that will remind people of what Silver did in election years at the NYT.

Using his own index he calculates the percentage chance a team has to win the game, and the expected score minus garbage time possessions.

At Football Outsiders heโ€™s a part of the team that maintains F/+, which is an alternative advanced stats ratings system similar to when KenPom does in basketball.

IRFU report shows 74% decrease in international squad drug testing

Aaron Rodgers may lose $4.5m gamble as baseball star admits to drug use

Published with permission from
View comments
Close
Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Smith
    Favourite Mark Smith
    Report
    Apr 4th 2021, 2:58 PM

    That might just be a cover for his loss of form

    2
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.