IT IS EASY to lose track of time in these strange days of lockdown and isolation caused by the coronavirus pandemic.
Right now it seems an eternity ago, yet it was only a year to the day – March 28, 2019 – that Ole Gunnar Solskjaer was appointed as Manchester United’s full-time manager.
The Red Devils had won 14 of their 19 games in all competitions during Solskjaer’s temporary stint, including a famous Champions League last-16 second-leg comeback at Paris Saint-Germain.
Rio Ferdinand had demanded United hand his fellow club icon a blank contract to sign and the good times were, it seemed, on their way back to Old Trafford.
And yet after all that early promise, it has been a year largely of stagnation. 12 months of two steps forward, then a couple back. Those early successes seem like halcyon days, although there were encouraging signs prior to the suspension of the Premier League as a result of the Covid-19 outbreak. Below, we have taken a look at how Solskjaer’s United compare to the other “big six” (Liverpool, Manchester City, Chelsea, Tottenham and Arsenal) over the past 12 months in the Premier League with the help of Opta data.
If Alex Ferguson’s Manchester United knocked Liverpool ‘off their f***ing perch’, then Jurgen Klopp’s Reds have conquered all in front of them in their bid to return to it.
Liverpool’s wait for a Premier League title may have been frustratingly held up, but over the past year they have accumulated an astonishing 103 points from 36 top-flight matches.
That is 22 more than Manchester City, second in our table for this span, have accumulated.
United are a whopping 50 points adrift of Liverpool’s accumulation having played a game more. Indeed, their tally of 53 is only the seventh best and is fewer than Wolves (56) and Crystal Palace (55) have amassed.
Chelsea have managed 63 and are fourth behind Leicester City (64), but United have amassed more points than both Tottenham (51) and Arsenal (50).
A concern for United fans is the fact they have won just 14 of the 37 league games played during Solskjaer’s permanent stewardship thus far.
Of our “big six”, only Arsenal (12) have triumphed in fewer outings, with Tottenham on the same number and Chelsea (18), City (26) and Liverpool (34) all ahead.
In the same period, only Spurs – now managed by the man Solskjaer replaced, Jose Mourinho – have lost more games, with 14 to United’s 12.
The January signing of Bruno Fernandes has gone some way to helping United’s creativity void in midfield, though their return of 51 goals is significantly lower than Liverpool (85) and City (84).
Only the Gunners (50) have managed fewer, with Chelsea (64) and Spurs (57) both ahead of Solskjaer’s side in this bracket.
It comes as little surprise that United also struggle in terms of shot conversion (9%). Chelsea (10%), Spurs, City, Arsenal (all 12%) and Liverpool (15%) all perform better.
It is not necessarily for a lack of effort. United have registered more shots (544) and shots on target (203) than both Arsenal (411 and 141) and Spurs (486 and 169).
Defensively, United stand up reasonably well against their five major rivals. They have conceded fewer goals (44) than each of Arsenal (48), Spurs (47) and Chelsea (45). Liverpool (25) and City (33), unsurprisingly, lead in that department too.
But United have not been able to keep too many clean sheets. Indeed, they have denied opposition sides from scoring on just eight occasions. Only Tottenham – with seven - have a worse record.
United have faced 142 shots on target, which is less than Spurs (180) and Arsenal (185).
Solskjaer will hope to see these numbers improved and his side’s resurgence continue whenever sport is given the green light again.
Wow. Doom and gloom article
@Brian Dunne: I think most of that doom and gloom was backed up with facts and figures. If you’re looking for good news articles about Man United maybe you should look in a history book.
@Mick O’Donoghue: a certain ABU I take it. History book is a bit of a exaggeration now.
@Mick O’Donoghue: loads of positives about utd mick. Playing better football, defence looking stronger. Ole’s signings looking good. Young players like williams and greenwood looking very promising. There is enjoyment watching the games again.
@Brian Dunne: I think that’s the biggest thing. You actually like the players on the field now. Haven’t really been able to say that since Fergie arguably. Also 8 clean sheets in the last 11 or 12 games or something… there’s been a few false dawns before but something feels a bit more solid about them now
@Mossy: definitely signs of improvement mossy. Ole’s instilled a bit of pride back into the club. Im optimistic for the future.
@Pauly Kells: not an ABU. Very specifically a Liverpool fan! You’re right about the history book being an exaggeration. I’m sure the42 has an archive feature from 7 or 8 years ago.
@Brian Dunne: I am absolutely taking the you-know-what. I actually kinda agree, but good football and optimism did very little for Liverpool circa 1997 (7 years from their last league win).
@Brian Dunne: With some good coaching, Daniel James looks a real talent.
@Mick O’Donoghue: it’s only 2013 since utd last won a lge so it would be a fairly up to date “history book”
@Pauly Kells: it’ll all be in Alex Ferguson’s autobiography, It came out in 2013
@Mick O’Donoghue: didn’t see it saying history book on the top, for a Liverpool fan your very concerned about utd even fergies autobiography, ha bet ya read it and all will you on will ya ffs.
In fairness he has a group of players now that want to do well for united some quality has been bought but the number one priority for united is to offload pogba. He’s bad news and if he comes back into that team the chemistry will change it, big time.