Updated at 22.28
CHELSEA WERE MADE to pay heavily for missed chances as they squandered a lead to lose 2-1 at Wolves on Wednesday.
Ruben Loftus-Cheek looked set to take centre-stage when he marked just his second Premier League start of the season with the opening goal in the 18th minute.
But two goals in four second-half minutes by Raul Jimenez and Diogo Jota brought a dramatic turnaround after the visitors had wasted several opportunities to close out the game.
It was a night to forget for Blues goalkeeper Kepa Arrizabalaga, who committed a howler to concede Wolvesโ equaliser.
It meant a second defeat in three League outings for Maurizio Sarriโs side, which featured five changes in the starting line-up but looked set to claim victory during a comfortable first-half display.
Loftus-Cheekโs inclusion in the first XI was a significant talking point after a week of rumours that the young England midfielder could seek a loan move to secure more senior games.
While the 22-year-oldโs goal had a huge element of good fortune, his performance in the opening 45 minutes was an eye-catching one with a combination of power, deft touches and clever movement providing the home side with consistent problems.
While he faded a little after the interval, it seems inconceivable the Chelsea academy product will not be afforded more opportunities in the remainder of the season.
When Sarri opted to make a second-half change in search of an equaliser following Wolvesโ impressive turnaround, it was not Loftus-Cheek but NโGolo Kante who made way for Mateo Kovacic.
- Kante question -
Kanteโs position will again raise eyebrows among Chelsea fans, with Sarri choosing once more not to deploy the Frenchman in his favoured holding midfield role.
Summer-signing Jorginho has usurped the World Cup-winner to become Sarriโs preferred deep-lying midfielder but even with the Italy international rested Sarri deployed Cesc Fabregas as his most withdrawn midfielder.
With Chelseaโs new manager favouring creativity over energy in the holding role, Kante looks like a star without a role as he enjoyed moments of promise in a more advanced position but failed to impose himself in the manner that made him a title-winning lynchpin with both Leicester and the Blues.
Sarriโs regular goalscoring worries were also laid bare once more as Alvaro Morata laboured unsuccessfully for 65 minutes before being withdrawn.
It was a momentous night for Wolves, however, with Nuno Espirito Santoโs side recording their first victory in seven league games to bring an end to a slump that had followed an impressive start to the season.
They were second best for much of the first half and had already withstood some Chelsea pressure when the visitors took the lead.
Loftus-Cheek cut in from the left and hit a curling shot that struck the head of the unlucky Conor Coady to wrongfoot goalkeeper Rui Patricio and creep inside the near post.
A fine save by Patricio denied Willian a second goal for the visitors before a brilliant saving challenge from Ryan Bennett thwarted Chelseaโs Brazilian star for a second time.
Morata and Kante both went close for Chelsea early in the second period but Wolves were level just before the hour mark when Morgan Gibbs-White fed Jimenez, who drilled a low shot under goalkeeper Kepa.
The winner came in the 63rd minute when Matt Doherty crossed and Jota side-footed home.
Elsewhere, Fulham edged to within a point of safety despite blowing the lead in a 1-1 draw with Leicester.
Honours were also even in a 1-1 draw between Everton and Newcastle as Richarlison cancelled out Salomon Rondonโs opener.
Subscribe to our new podcast, Heineken Rugby Weekly on The42, here:
Heโs one more win from getting his British passport back!!!
Great comment. Well done
Thereโs a new one!
How hilarious. And so original. Iโve almost never heard that gag before.
But tell me this. Once the ocean of laughter has subsided and weโve all had our sides stiched up, Iโm curious to know whether thereโs any actual evidence for your implication that the Brits claim Murray as their own when he wins and refer to him as Scottish when he loses. Are there any facts to back that up, or is it just another one of our bitter little fantasies?
You sound bitter yourself. And yes commentators have been known to make him a Brit when he wins
Wow, some vintage โlogical thinkingโ there. Gotta hand it to you, youโre a latter-day Wittgenstein. But, at the risk of repeating myself, do you have any actual evidence for your suggestion that theyโre more likely to refer to him as British when he wins than when he loses? Or did you just make it up?
She is pure dirt and I like it.
I love the way she spots herself on the big screen at the end of her rant and the eyes go very wide.
She looks very naughty..
Goes like โif it wasnโt for the money,Iโd never go near this boring,ugly Scottish pโฌ(&k. And his mother is suck an annoying B$ยฃ%h I hope she gets hit in the mouth with a tennis ballโ
Anger issues perhaps, Fearghal?
No
Fearghalโฆ.Anger and envyโฆsad life for you.
Ahh yeah
Sp@nk on me tโฌts Ya durty basstโฌ&d ??
Iโll show you where to stick that fist later you f***. Pure filth indeed
You should donate here:
http://www.vice.com/read/these-porn-stars-are-getting-naked-for-charity-823
Im no expert but im getting โim f******g loving that s**t you something f**kโโฆโฆ..pottymouth indeed
F****ng have it you czech f****ng f***
Something along the lines of โf*cking have that you Chech flash f*ckโ is what it looks like to me!
Itโs quite clear. Theyโre saying โโฆup..town funk you up, I said uptown funk you upโฆโ
Sheโs saying โfcuk, what a fcukin loser โ shouldโve hit on the other guyโ
Heโs saying โfcuk with a few more wins, I could have a chick without a giant forehead โ like Ester โฆ โ
Something about putting up a shelf !
Think she said: โ Iโd fecking love a fish fecking supper with fecking fresh fecking fishโ?
You win my vote. Ha awesome!
I think sheโs saying โthe journals using fluching sh!t vines again, fluichs sake.
โFu3k off ya shagging french fu3ker.โ I am 98% certain. Filthy dirty bird. And before you ask yes I am a born professional lip reader. 35 years experience.
How can we speculate on what she is saying if there is a bold word filter, for flock sake! See what I mean, we are all adults, mostly, so why canโt we say the bold words?! You can keep the โCโ word on the โbold wordโ list but allow it during articles about cyclists!
Fu@king have that shit you flash fu@ckโฆ Nice!!
Think Andys goin to get his rocks off tonight
I got โu may be beautiful but theyโre keeping my idea on file, in a filing cabinetโ
If Iโm right, she ought to be ashamed. Filth.
Cheer up you miserable scotch cannnttt
โIโm gonna f@@kin make you the best f@@kin sandwich you ever had when we get homeโฆโฆf@@kโ
Fu*king hell have a shower you french fcuk ! Is what sheโs saying
Whereโs my comment?!!
It actually looks like fed up of this sh-it, the french f**k
Itโs shite being scotttishh
A: Fลซcking cโmon
A: yessssh
Aโs girlfriend: Fรผck all off, you chechen fat fลซck
Anyone lip read what Bryan Dobson said at the end of 6.1 tonight? lol.
Fuxk off you check Fat Fuxxer. ?
F*ck I forgot to put up that shelf, F*ckity F*ckโ ????!!
It looks to me very much like, โF*ck Berdych, the old fashioned f*ck.โ!
Iโd fckin love a shower and freshin up?
She is stunning and classy โค๏ธ
Second attempt: โF*ck off, Berdych, you old fashioned f*ckโ!
โIโm a lovely shy fat fanโ
Andy Murray โah f@ck, come onโ
โI feel like having a shite, fart after fartโฆโ Bad lip read?