• Australia's largest state hits record-high COVID-19 cases despite weeks of strict lockdown. 'It's a tinderbox ready to explode,' one official said.
• eToro says crypto made up 73% of trading commissions in the last quarter, as retail customers dived in
• A flight attendant says she was too exhausted to report a passenger who shoved her when a flight was overbooked: report
• US jobless claims climb for first time in 5 weeks, to 353,000

A COUPLE OF Lance Armstrong’s old Nike ads from years ago look extremely strange in light of the recent U.S. Anti-Doping Agency report, which alleges that the cyclist did indeed take banned substances, and spent years as a master manipulator of the system.

In both ads, Armstrong talks about doping and banned substances. One ad actually shows a technician drawing blood from his arm, presumably for a drug test.

In both ads, Armstrong implies that his talent comes from his work attitude, not illegal performance enhancers.

But in both ads — and this is the really weird bit — Armstrong doesn’t explicitly deny doping. Instead, he elides the issue by suggesting that his critics are losers.

Armstrong’s seven Tour de France titles will likely be stripped from him as a result of the report, but Nike is standing by him, due to his charity work. (See both ads below.)

In the first ad, from 2001, Armstrong intones:

This is my body and I can do whatever I want to it. I can push it, and study it, tweak it, listen to it. Everybody wants to know what I’m on. What am I on? I’m on my bike, busting my ass six hours a day. What are you on?

All of that is technically true, whether he took drugs or not. The phrase “I can … tweak it” now seem especially prescient. And he avoids the answer to his self-posed question, “What am I on?”

Here’s the ad:

(YouTube credit: JChau)

In the second ad, Armstrong discusses the cancer survivors who inspired him to set up his Livestrong Foundation:

The critics say I’m arrogant, a doper, washed up, a fraud, that I couldn’t let it go. They can say whatever they want. I’m not back on my bike for them.

Again, technically Armstrong didn’t deny being a doper, even after raising the issue himself.

(YouTube credit: VHKLHoldings)

There are two explanations for the double-coincidences. Cynics will argue that as Armstrong knew he would be lying if he outright said he was clean, he deliberately ensured the script never said that.

The alternative explanation might be that both Nike and Armstrong were trying to make commercials that were cool. There’s nothing more uncool than re-enacting a Nancy Reagan-style “just say no” message, and thus the spots are deliberately subtle.

Stephen Kelly persuaded to board Faroes flight after management bust-up – reports