FORMER ENGLAND AND Celtic striker Chris Sutton has accused Professional Footballers’ Association chief Gordon Taylor of letting players down after a landmark study showing the link between football and dementia.
A Glasgow University study found former footballers are approximately three-and-a-half times more likely to die from neurodegenerative diseases than the general population.
The report, released on Monday, was commissioned by England’s Football Association and the PFA and assessed the medical records of 7,676 men who played professional football in Scotland between 1900 and 1976.
Outgoing PFA chief executive Taylor has been strongly criticised for his lack of action on the subject, in particular by the family of former West Bromwich Albion striker Jeff Astle, whose 2002 death from chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) was linked to repeatedly heading heavy leather footballs.
“The confirmation that there is a link between football and dementia brings me no satisfaction. It makes me angry,” Sutton said in a column in the Daily Mail.
“Angry for people like my dad, Mike, and other former footballers who are dying in the most horrible and humiliating way. Angry for the future generations who will suffer, too, because this study was rolled out 15 years too late.”
Sutton said a study should have been commissioned in 2002 after Astle’s death.
“The PFA, led by Gordon Taylor, had a duty of care to their members,” Sutton said. “They let them down.”
He added: “My dad, a former Norwich player, is suffering from chronic traumatic encephalopathy — a degenerative disease of the brain caused by repetitive brain trauma. He is 75 and first developed symptoms of dementia when he was still in his sixties.”
Jeff Astle’s daughter, Dawn, who has been campaigning since her father’s death for football to research into the area, said she was “staggered” to learn of the findings.
My overall feeling is that I am staggered even though my own research and instinct was always that there was a serious problem,” she said.
“There will be no celebrations. It doesn’t bring my dad back, it won’t bring any other dads and husbands back.
“We knew dad could not be the only one. We just wanted that question answered.”
The42 is on Instagram! Tap the button below on your phone to follow us!
Not to make light of it but 3.5 times more likely than very unlikely is still very unlikely. Loads of players played football and don’t have any issues and loads of people never played football and do have issues. The study also pointed out that deaths in general under the age of 60 were hugely reduced in those that played football compared to the general population. There is a lot more in this than just heading footballs gives you a neurodegenerative disease and the media reporting of it has been very irresponsible imo.
@Dino: Still, it’s significant enough to warrant a change in training practises & age grade football. Better giving people the knowledge so that they can make the choice. I obviously think people should participate in sport and stay active, but to do so with the full knowledge of associated risks and benefits.
@Joseph Blocks: is it significant enough? I haven’t seen anything to say it is. If the chances of football causing brain injury are 0.0000001 then 3.5 times this is 0.00000035 which is still insignificant. Don’t just read the headline
Ban heading and we might actually have a better game….especially in this part of the world!! Kids & teens definitely should not be heading the ball full stop… and they might actually learn to play ‘foot’ ball
Shocking although good more is known now. Balls are lighter too
@dublindamo: The dry weight has actually changed very little. However until the eighties balls would get very heavy when wet, which could well have caused the most damage when heading.