US GOVERNMENT PROSECUTORS just made a huge mistake in their attempt to try Roger Clemens for perjury and it made lead to a mistrial.
ESPN’s TJ Quinn – who has been tweeting live from the courthouse throughout the trial – says that Judge Reggie Walton is furious with the prosecution team after they showed an exhibit to the jury that violated an pre-trial ruling on evidence.
However, the Clemens defense team is expected to argue that Pettitte misunderstood Clemens. Therefore, it doesn’t matter what he told his wife, because his statement would have been incorrect.
In pre-trial rulings, Judge Walton agreed and said that unless the defense challenged Pettitte’s memory (not his understanding) then Laura Pettitte could not be called as a witness.
That brings us to today, when the prosecution displayed a video exhibit in front of the jury that specifically referenced Laura Pettitte’s sworn statements. The jury wasn’t supposed to know about them and now they do.
So not only have government lawyers introduced evidence that they weren’t supposed to, they violated a directed order from Judge Walton. For the second time. (The US Attorney argued that they prepared the exhibit before the judge’s ruling and simply forgot to change it.
Naturally, Judge Walton is not happy about. He doesn’t want to undo all the time and effort they’ve put into the trial so far, but will have to decided if the jury has been unfairly prejudiced.
Before calling a break, Walton said “I don’t see how I can unring the bell.’’
Mistrial declared in the Roger Clemens trial
Reproduced with permission from Business Insider
US GOVERNMENT PROSECUTORS just made a huge mistake in their attempt to try Roger Clemens for perjury and it made lead to a mistrial.
ESPN’s TJ Quinn – who has been tweeting live from the courthouse throughout the trial – says that Judge Reggie Walton is furious with the prosecution team after they showed an exhibit to the jury that violated an pre-trial ruling on evidence.
Quinn says that after much arguing with the lawyers, the judge has called for a break to consider ruling on this violation. If he jury has been unfairly tainted, he may have to declare a mistrial.
At issue is the testimony of Andy and Laura Pettitte. Andy is expected to be called to testify that Clemens admitted to him that he used performance enhancing drugs. The government also wants to call Laura Pettitte to back up Andy’s claim (since he told his wife what Clemens told him.) Both of them submitted affidavits before Congress submitting to that fact
However, the Clemens defense team is expected to argue that Pettitte misunderstood Clemens. Therefore, it doesn’t matter what he told his wife, because his statement would have been incorrect.
In pre-trial rulings, Judge Walton agreed and said that unless the defense challenged Pettitte’s memory (not his understanding) then Laura Pettitte could not be called as a witness.
That brings us to today, when the prosecution displayed a video exhibit in front of the jury that specifically referenced Laura Pettitte’s sworn statements. The jury wasn’t supposed to know about them and now they do.
So not only have government lawyers introduced evidence that they weren’t supposed to, they violated a directed order from Judge Walton. For the second time. (The US Attorney argued that they prepared the exhibit before the judge’s ruling and simply forgot to change it.
Naturally, Judge Walton is not happy about. He doesn’t want to undo all the time and effort they’ve put into the trial so far, but will have to decided if the jury has been unfairly prejudiced.
Before calling a break, Walton said “I don’t see how I can unring the bell.’’
Read more at Business Insider>
LIVE: British Open, day one>
Sprint Finish: here’s everything you need to know about Stage 12 of Le Tour>
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Courtroom drama MLB Roger Clemens