LIVERPOOL STRIKER LUIS Suarez has tonight been handed a eight-match ban and a hefty £40,000 fine for racially abusing Manchester United’s Patrice Evra.
The Old Trafford defender insisted he was racially abused ‘up to 10 times’ by the Uruguayan during the 1-1 draw at Anfield in October.
“An Independent Regulatory Commission has today found a charge of misconduct against Luis Suarez proven,” an FA statement reads, “and have issued a suspension for a period of eight matches as well as fining him £40,000, pending appeal.”
English Association chiefs said any ban would not start until the outcome of any appeal.
Liverpool, meanwhile, hit back quickly, issuing a long statement which beings: “Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.
“We look forward to the publication of the Commission’s Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.
“We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play – including Evra’s own Manchester United teammates and all the match officials – heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.
“The Club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person’s background.
“LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable – without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible – certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.
“It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said ‘I don’t think that Luis Suarez is racist’. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist. Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black. He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person’s skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.
“He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was Captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.
“It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised. It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November. Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.”
The player, for his part, took to Twitter to make his own statement.
“Today is a very difficult and painful day for both me and my family. Thanks for all the support, I’ll keep working!..,” he wrote, on the social media site tonight.
I rarely agree with dubs but I agree with him. It’ll make the game too stop start, and kill any momentum. Hopefully teams don’t start hoofing long balls now, and they try and play good football like Dublin/mayo/cork/kerry
@Cortiss: be good to see Cork sticking their chest out again
@Cortiss: Cork?!?!?! Strange one
@Cortiss: sure you love a long ball yourself
@Jamie Bent: they play great attacking football, still nowhere near the top teams but I admire their style. Admittedly I am a cork man
@Cortiss: they put in a great display against Dublin in the super 8’s
@Cortiss: what momentum? Most games are full of lateral and backward handpassing at walking pace with occasional bursts of pace. Football coaches caused this rule change. The biggest problem football faces is football people. You ruined your own game, spend all the time bitching about that but are unwilling to do anything about it. Change the record.
@Cortiss: he’s 100% right .. what will happen it clever teams will play clever little pass, just on the limit of the distance, straight into the chest of an attacker running away from goal! Players like Mannion have the pace to get out a step ahead of their marker, sprint out of from the goal to receive a basic kick pass to the chest… he then ridiculously gets rewarded with a free shot instead of having to deal with the defender who’s now breathing down his neck. Before the new rule he may have been dispossessed by defender or had a shot or pass blocked but now the game will stop. The only way to tweak rule to stop this is to insist the ball is caught above the head
@Cortiss: sorry for your troubles (been from Cork I mean)
Why on earth would the dubs want anything to change? Plus when they did play with the mark last year they were badly exposed by it. And you’ll hit me with the ‘oh but sure they didn’t work on it I training’ but if it’s such a basic skill like mannion said then surely defending it is a basic skill also?
@Mel Roberts: do you honestly think the mark will change the way Mannion or Con play Mel? They field the ball and run at defences with it
@my name: in fairness I think he’s saying they’re team will suffer not that it’ll force mannion to change the way he plays
@my name: I’m not talking about how they will play. I’m talking about how exposed your full back line was when they came up against teams who could use the mark to their advantage. It’s your full back line that would need to change the way they play
@Mel Roberts: something along these lines?
https://www.sportsjoe.ie/gaa/brian-howard-175554
@my name: was that against the mark? Eh no. Does Brian Howard play in the full back line eh no. I’m talking about against the mark last year they looked exposed. Why bring something irrelevant into it?
@Mel Roberts: was Brian Howard playing in the full back line? Was the ball delivered to a target man on the square? See the similarities there? I can’t make it any easier for you buddy. The ball was defended on the full back line
@my name: mate have a read at my initial comment. When Dublin full back line have played against the mark they have been exposed. You be gave one example of a fella who’s not a back making a catch which wasn’t against the mark as it wasn’t in use then
@Mel Roberts: what position was Murchan playing in that game or jack mccaffery in the drawn game? Dublin players don’t play the number on their back is the point I’m making here Mel. Like you said, last season they didn’t train for the mark. They probably won’t have time before the league kicks off this year as they’ve been away. They’ll use the league as training for the championship. You’re a football man, thought you’d see that
Sorry my reference for Murchan was this goal
https://youtu.be/2mheijU7QIM
@my name: But sure if catching a ball is such a basic skill like mannion has said it is why couldn’t Dublin defenders do it against the mark last year?
@my name: why are you throwing up games where there’s no mark? Read what I have said, against the mark they were exposed which they were. You’ve gave 2 examples where there’s no mark?
@Mel Roberts: I’ve made it as simple as I can for you pal but no you just want to sling mud. You’re the very man who posts on here constantly saying everyone’s against you and Tyrone. Yet every chance you get you’re at Dublin no matter the subject, you actually compared yourself to James McClean the other day too. I give up, you bring it on yourself and then have a wee cry about it
@my name: I mean why are you posting from games where there is no mark to make a point that Dublin can defend the mark? That’s all I’ve asked? I’ve no slung any mud
@my name: btw I never compared myself to James mcclean. I said that you are all happy to jump on the bandwagon when he’s getting abuse but at the same time agree with someone labelling all northerners as brits
@Mel Roberts: badly exposed by the mark last year? When the facts are that Dublin had the best points difference (+23) in the league last year
@my name: Teams that utilised the mark exposed them, Tyrone tore them apart as did monaghan and showed that they were vulnerable against it
@Mel Roberts: Tyrone tore into Paddy Andrews and left marks alright. Come the business end of the season Mel, you know full well Dublin aren’t getting torn apart by Tyrone
@my name: I never said they were? If there’s a way to get at Dublin that’s it though. As for paddy Andrews an accidental collision? Really still going on about that
@Mel Roberts: the Dubs were exposed by the mark the last time because they knew it wasn’t being used in the championship and so they rightly completely ignored it in training… planning instead for the C’ship without it!! Be under no illusion Dubs will exploit this as well as everyone and better than most now that it’s in. It’s a terrible rule that will lead to attackers running away from goal to receive easy passes to the check and be rewarded with a free shot
@my name: he won’t have to run at defences… all he’ll have to do is run out from goal 1 step ahead of his marker and receive a basic pass into the check. He’ll then have 15secs for easy free. What people need to ask themselves is “what’s the worst way this new mark could be exploited?” “What way can it be exploited that goes against the spirit of what it is intended for” – And that’s exactly how it will be used!!
@Meatloaf: i disagree – I think he’s looking forward to kicking easy frees for fun without having to beat his marker other than getting 1 step ahead of him as he runs away from goal to receive a basic pass into the chest… of this is what happens it will be awful
Most full back lines look vulnerable under a high ball. In my view it will make the game more defensive
@John O Reilly: everyone is assuming it will be exploited via a ‘high ball’… when in my view 90% of the scores will come from attackers sprinting away from goal to receive an easy kick pass into their chest
15 seconds for a forward to play the ball once a mark is called. Totally unrealistic in terms of what the y get normally. Every attack should end in a score. Expect more fouling up the field and more packed defenses
@JPM: Thats a very intelligent comment, I agree completely with the point you make about realistic game play. Hurling has become so much more popular at least in terms of watching the sport as its continously about attack and flow of the game. I suppose if I was to make a point about the mark, even though its available to an attacking team, it doesnt necessarily mean they will use it. A more important issue might be that this rule will add further pressure onto referees.
Why are we forever tinkering with the rules of our game? We have the greatest sport in the world, just leave it be. I don’t see fifa introducing 4 or 5 new rule changes every year
@The Analyst: no, just one massive one…. VAR!
I’m sure we will see Tyrone kicking penetrating long passes as they surge forward
@John O Reilly: you mean just like they did all last year? Have you actually ever watched Tyrone play or does your hatred just stem from all things north of the border?
@Mel Roberts: how do you feel about Mickey Harte
@Mel Roberts: I just dislike sledging. I think it’s disgusting
@John O Reilly: is this an article about Mickey harte? Why not answer my question instead of throwing up that nonsense
@Mel Roberts: I did
@John O Reilly: give me an example of Mickey harte sledging? Are Tyrone the only team that does it? Ever played against Tyrone to know?
@Mel Roberts: I never said Mickey Harte sledged anyone. but tyrone players did. I asked your view about Mickey Harte as a manager
@John O Reilly: He’s one of the greatest managers the game has ever seen in my opinion and the opinion of many
@Mel Roberts: should he stay on
@John O Reilly: This year yes
@Mel Roberts: after this… if they don’t win recall ireland
@John O Reilly: No and I think he will go himself and it’s well known who his replacement will be
@Mel Roberts: who?
@John O Reilly: Mel Roberts!
@John O Reilly: Malachy o Rourke according to people in the know
@Joe Kennedy:
@Joe Kennedy: taking the minors this year joe
@Mel Roberts: haha….Fair play.
Just as the tied against packed defences had turned congress steps up and potentially shoves us straight down that road all over again. Jesus wept
hi
my hot photos are here …
http://69-chat.club
only 18+