- Australia's largest state hits record-high COVID-19 cases despite weeks of strict lockdown. 'It's a tinderbox ready to explode,' one official said.
- eToro says crypto made up 73% of trading commissions in the last quarter, as retail customers dived in
- A flight attendant says she was too exhausted to report a passenger who shoved her when a flight was overbooked: report
- US jobless claims climb for first time in 5 weeks, to 353,000
PEYTON MANNING HAS angrily fired back at a report that strongly suggested that he is unwilling to serve as the Denver Broncos’ back-up quarter-back when he is healthy enough to play, calling the report “bullshit and insulting”.
On Sunday, Ian Rapoport reported on the NFL Network about what he described as “a very uncomfortable and difficult situation,” concerning Manning’s status on the Broncos.
“It is a trying time for Peyton Manning who has always been a starter in his entire career,” Rapoport said. “[It] does not sound like he is inclined to be Brock Osweiler’s back-up. That is one issue, and one I am told he is pretty serious about.”
On the surface, this could just mean that Manning doesn’t want to be a back-up player, a fair sentiment for anybody as every player wants to be a starter. However, Rapoport took it a step further.
Rich Eisen, seemingly seeking to clarify the comments, asked Rapoport if we would see a healthy Manning serving as a backup quarterback: ”My understanding is [that] is not, not going to happen,” Rapoport responded.
Following the Broncos’ defeat to the Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday, Manning was asked about the report: “It’s bullshit and it’s insulting,” Manning said.
John Elway, the Broncos’ executive VP of football operations and general manager, also denied that Manning has made any demands about playing time.
What is unclear at this point is exactly what Manning was asked and what he and Elway thought the report said.
There was confusion in the media, with some reports saying Manning had told the team he would not serve as a backup.
However, there is no indication that Rapoport ever reported any demands being made by Manning, only that ”there are plenty of people who know that Peyton does not want to be the backup.”
Again, that Manning would want to start when healthy is probably a safe assumption that most people would make.
Brock has played amazing in Peytons absence. He will find it tough to get back him starter job. Brock is a FA next year. Broncos must not let him walk and that’s from a Chargers fan.
Chargers fan, my sympathies
Thanks, been a tough year. Injuries mounting up cost us yet again.
I agree peyton might not even be around next season so the Broncos have to think about the franchises future.
Brock has played amazing in Peytons absence.
Points scored by Denver in 2nd half of last 3 games. 0, 0, 0.
He’s been better than Manning but a long, long way from amazing. Now if he could just see his way to another of those performances against the Bengals this week he could hand my Chiefs the division and take Denver out of the playoffs! Now that would be amazing.
We, it was hardly his fault Mack sacked him 5 times vs Raiders. Or my Chargers defense finally showed up in the game before. He needs playing time to improve and he is getting it. Good draft class of QB that year, and bad ones too ie RG3 & Weeden
I’d always take a report by Ian Rapoport with a pinch of salt.
Peyton Manning is not going to be a starting quality QB next season either way so from a purely practical point of view it might be the right moment to really get a look at Brock “The Lobster” Osweiler now when the pressure game is on. Manning wasn’t doing a good job earlier on in the season and I think Osweiler has earned the right to carry on as starting QB for this season.
Write off Manning at your Peril. Could easily have another quality year left in him despite his poor performances this season
Did anyone else this Brock was poor last night in the second half when the pressure came on. A long way to go yet