Murray Kinsella reports from Allianz Park
MUNSTER WERE BEATEN 33-10 by Saracens at Allianz Park this afternoon. You can read our full match report here.
Munsterโs error count
Munster themselves flagged how vital a low error count was going to be this week, given that so many of Sarriesโ scores tend to come directly from the mistakes of their opponents.
No team goes out to make errors, but Munsterโs were massively costly at Allianz Park. The opening score of the game came from Duncan Williamsโ attempt to run the ball out of his own 22, while the first Saracens try came after Ian Keatley had kicked the pill dead.
The second try through Chris Aston followed a breakdown offence from Felix Jones. Elsewhere, Paul OโConnell was uncharacteristically loose in possession and others produced stifling errors.
Picking out individuals is not the point, rather that competing at this level in Europe means not making the kind of mistakes that allow the opposition easy โinsโ to making scoreboard gains.
Sarries on a different planet
In an overall sense, it was difficult to argue that Saracensโ 23-point winning margin did not tell the story of the game. In fact, a bonus-point try would have been well earned as Mark McCallโs men put in their strongest performance of the season.
In contrast, Munster fell well below their own standards in a season that has been inconsistent. They are capable of far better than this showing when in form, but today Saracens were on a different level.
Even the basics of the game escaped Munster as they spilled possession, went off their feet at rucks and missed hits in open play. Discipline was poor for Munster too, but Saracens were impressively polished.
Saracens variety
Though much of the focus in Ireland will be on Munsterโs performance, Saracens turned up in impressive fashion to score three tries and generally look more than comfortable in victory.
There was direct power in their display, with the Vunipolas and centre pair Brad Barritt and Marcelo Bosch carrying strongly, but they also offered some clever flourishes in attack through their use of screen passes behind the same men.
Tip-on passes from the forwards unsettled Munsterโs front line defence, while the half-backs varied their kicking game well. As for the first Chris Ashton try, Saracens were not afraid burst away on the counter when the opportunity arose.
It was a varied performance from Mark McCallโs men, exactly the kind of showing Munster fans might have hoped for.
Munster blunted
Herein, we lead on from that directly above. Munsterโs chasing of the game was largely predictable and rarely involving passing and width until they were desperate. Although there were limited glimpses, Foleyโs men actually looked at their most threatening when the ball was moved wider.
Felix Jones made one first-half break from deep wide on the left, while Andrew Conway surged down the right on an earlier occasion. Getting one-on-one attacking situations generally favoured Munster, but they created those chances too little.
Though Munster never enjoyed a true foothold in the Saracensโ 22, barring one early visit in the second half when Mako Vunipola won a superb turnover penalty and the Denis Hurley try, the issue of limited ambition with ball in hand reared its head again.
Where was JJ?
A moot point at this stage, but it was hard to understand why Munster didnโt send JJ Hanrahan into the game before the closing six minutes. Hurley did score a late try, but with Munster trailing so badly at half time, was there scope to bring in the Kerryman?
There were far greater collective issues for Foleyโs men, and one player canโt decide a match, but surely Hanrahanโs creativity and line-breaking spark would have added something as Munster essentially chased the game from a very early stage?
Simon Zebo was a lone attacking spark on the left wing for Munster; would he have seen more touches with Hanrahanโs passing on in midfield?
I thought Barcelona are over a billion in debt & now they are spending โฌ1.5 billion on their stadium and they also want to buy Mohammed Salah?
Wha?
@OโBrien Michael: Iโve come to learn that when rich people and teams are in debt itโs not the same as us being in debt. They can always find someone else to lend them more
@OโBrien Michael: They have signed a huge sponsorship deal with Spotify including the naming rights to the Camp Nou. Once they satisfy the Spanish league funding requirements they can sign who they want.
Woe and betide any financial institution that try to foreclose on Barca
@thomas walsh: yes but surely someone at some stage is going to have to say enough is enough.
We are not even talking about being millions in debt we are talking billions now.
Barcelona just defy belief what they are at.
@Diarmuid: how much is the sponsorship deal worth Diarmuid?
@Diarmuid: did the tour of the nou camp about 7-8 years back,cost about 15 euros each at the time. Place was full of people,busโs and busโs everywhere.Think it costs about 60 now to do the tour wonโt get as many doing it.
@OโBrien Michael: if memory serves me think itโs worth around โฌ300 million over 4 years
@Joe Gorham: Joe I done the tour in summer 2019. Think it was around โฌ30 each well worth. โฌ60 certainly seems a huge increase.
@OโBrien Michael: This is an infrastructural project and the loans will be separate to the current debt to be paid back over 35 years. The idea is that the extra income from the expansion and upgrade will pay off the construction loans.
Itโs also not just the stadium. There will also be a new Blaugrana indoor arena, offices, a hotel and a new museum.
@Diarmuid: it does lad I work with just back from Barcelona and he said itโs too dear now to do unless your a barca fan.
Ed Sheeran playing a heap of gigs
Cork county board are project managing the build. Should only cost about 3 Billion
accbank still handing out loans