THE US ANTI-DOPING chief today dismissed accusations of a โwitch huntโ against Lance Armstrong and said he was delighted with reforms aimed at cleaning up cycling.
Travis Tygart, chief executive of the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), hit back at comments from former International Cycling Union (UCI) president Pat McQuaid.
โIt is easy for Pat McQuaid or others to say soundbites like he said,โ Tygart told reporters at the sidelines of an anti-doping intelligence seminar in Singapore.
But โthe evidence is telling. There have been roughly 26 athletes, coaches, team doctors who have been held accountable. Several of them have gotten lifetime bans as well,โ Tygart said.
Irishman McQuaid, UCIโs president from 2006 to 2013, said in a British radio interview last month that he had a โcertain sympathyโ with the seven-time Tour de France winner.
โHe was very much made a scapegoat, there was a witch-hunt after Armstrong,โ McQuaid told BBC Radio 5 Live, in comments which aired on 27 January.
โUSADA wanted a big name,โ McQuaid said, adding that the Colorado-based agency was not โreally interested in the smaller riders and also they made deals with the smaller riders in order to get the information they needed on the big guysโ.
Armstrong, 43, was stripped of his Tour titles and given a life ban from cycling by USADA in 2012 for using a cocktail of performance-enhancing drugs, having denied for years he was a cheat.
The cancer-survivor eventually made a public confession in a TV interview with US chat show host Oprah Winfrey in 2013. But last month, he also told the BBC he would cheat again if faced with the same circumstances.
- โThrilledโ with reforms -
Tygart questioned why Armstrong and McQuaid chose not to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), the main international sport appeal court, when the lifetime ban was imposed in 2012.
โLance certainly had every opportunity to challenge that sanction,โ Tygart said.
โAnd certainly Pat McQuaid could have appealed our decision to impose the lifetime ban. If he in any way felt that was unfair or was singling out Lance Armstrong, he certainly as the president of UCI had the appeal rights to go to CAS.โ
Tygart said he was โthrilledโ with reforms within the UCI, international cyclingโs governing body, after the scandal lifted the lid on widespread cheating in the sport.
Current UCI president Brian Cookson won an ugly leadership contest against McQuaid in September 2013, vowing to correct past wrongs.
โWe had recent meetings with themโฆ and we were thrilled and walked out of there understanding the governance changes, the rule changes that they have implemented,โ he said.
โAnd I think they appreciate that they had a bad culture where athletes had no choice other than the use of drugs if they wanted to compete and win.โ
While the changes โdoesnโt mean athletes arenโt going to cheatโ, it ensures the sportโs leadership โcontinues to do the best that it can to ensure a clean and healthy culture for individual athletes,โ Tygart said.
Cookson has said an inquiry commission probing the role of cyclingโs leaders in the Armstrong scandal will deliver its report this year.
The commissionโs main goal is to determine how a culture of doping was perpetuated between 1998 and 2013, and to establish who was to blame. It has appealed to riders who doped in the past to come forward in exchange for reduced punishment.
Originally published at 0814
What a load of tripe.
The same thing was said about bale 3 months after he signed for Madrid and look at him,
Bale got off to a reasonably better start at Madrid. Scored on debut and injured for half of season. Plenty of time for Suarez to prove heโs not a flop, though. Itโs unfair to judge him after 10 games. I think it took Henry 10 games to score his first for Arsenal.
Gary Dohertys retirement has thrown the whole thing out of kilter
Hopefully Barcelona are reading this and decide to cut their losses and sell him back to liverpool!
He is playing in a position that Liverpool deployed him for a few months last year. The goals dried up a bit then like now but his work rate and assists and overall performance never waned. Look at Liverpool now without him and that will put this article to bed.
Did Liverpool waste the fee they got for him. Oh yes!!!
Noโฆthey signed Markovic for about 20 million, well under his actual value of 100 millionโฆobviouslyโฆ
And the rest? Deluded Loserpool FC. Thereโs always next year lads.
You donโt really understand sarcasm Mauriceโฆ.
Heโs only been back for 2 months, give him a chance before writing him Off. If he bags a few goals against city in the next round it will be money week spent
heโs a great player the difference is at barcelona he is just another great player at liverpool he was the only great player.
If Barca not happy they might return him. Fingers crossed!!!