THE CONTROVERSIAL SUSPENSION handed down to Jason Forde after the clash with Davy Fitzgerald in last April’s hurling league semi-final remains a source of frustration to Tipperary.
Jason Forde and Davy Fitzgerald clash last April in Nowlan Park. Ryan Byrne / INPHO
Ryan Byrne / INPHO / INPHO
Tipperary secretary Tim Floyd, writing in his report ahead of next Sunday’s annual county convention, expressed his belief that Silvermines player Forde ‘was just guilty by association’ and suffered due to the high-profile nature of ‘one of the personalities involved’ in the incident.
23-year-old Forde was punished for contributing ‘to a melee’ but the definition of this term is an ‘issue of contention’ with Floyd.
The incident grabbed the headlines in the Nowlan Park clash when Wexford boss Fitzgerald went onto the pitch to remonstrate with referee Diarmuid Kirwan following Tipperary’s second goal and clashed with Premier players Niall O’Meara and Forde.
Tipperary's Jason Forde and Davy Fitzgerald. Ryan Byrne / INPHO
Ryan Byrne / INPHO / INPHO
Subsequently Forde was slapped with a proposed two-match suspension and Floyd has outlined Tipperary’s response to that sanction.
Advertisement
“The player, team manager and county board all agreed we should challenge this charge and we sought a hearing with the Central Hearings Committee (CHC). Indeed
the general public were shocked with the proposed suspension and would have been disappointed if we did not challenge it.
“The two match suspension would rule Jason out of the league final plus the Munster championship versus Cork which was a harsh sentence for a very trivial incident. Both the referee’s report and the sideline officials report made no mention of Jason Forde but the CCCC in their wisdom deemed it an assault.
Tipperary boss Michael Ryan and Cork's Kieran Kingston after May's Munster quarter-final. Cathal Noonan / INPHO
Cathal Noonan / INPHO / INPHO
“Our argument at the hearing was based on the word assault as the video clip only showed Jason pushing the Wexford manager and we also argued that Jason was being victimised due to the publicity around the incident.
“Most games include this type of “argy bargy” especially when an incoming sub is being greeted by his opponent so if this was being treated as an offence it opens the door to numerous similar incidents in games.
“We convinced the CHC as they concluded that jostling and pushing was not deemed an assault and so they decided that the infraction as alleged was not proven. Unfortunately they decided that the evidence did disclose an infraction less serious, that is to say “to contribute to a melee” for which they were imposing a one match suspension.
“Meanwhile Jason had played the league final and so would miss the Munster championship game v Cork. Once again we decided to challenge the decision of the CHC and we sought and received a hearing from the Central Appeals Committee (CAC).
“At the appeal we argued that a melee was never discussed at the hearing and Jason Forde could not have contributed to a melee if there was no melee.
“Once you go to a higher appeal body (The CAC) you are no longer challenging the original substantive issue, but the actual procedures adopted by the Hearings Committee in reaching their decision.
“We questioned the Central Hearings Committee’s right to bring forward a new charge that was not even mentioned at the hearing and argued they were not within their right to conclude that a melee occurred.
“The definition of the word melee also became central to the case. Our dictionaries defined a melee as involving many people or a throng, but the chairman of the CHC in his evidence said they defined it as three or more pushing and shoving and the person who starts a melee is regarded as contributing.
“The Central Appeals Committee upheld the decision of the Central Hearings and we lost the case. We decided against going to the Disputes Resolution Authorities (DRA) as Jason felt it was becoming too much of a distraction before an important championship game and so he served his one match ban on the sidelines against Cork just two weeks later.
“It’s very frustrating and disappointing to lose a disciplinary hearing especially when you see similar incidents in every game not being investigated. I still believe Jason Forde was just guilty by association in an incident that received wide scale publicity because of the high profile of one of the personalities involved.
“The definition of a melee as being a minimum of three people involved is still an issue of contention with me and I’m hoping to have it defined in the GAA Official Guide by passing a motion at our Co. Convention to be sent to Congress for consideration.”
The42 has just published its first book, Behind The Lines, a collection of some of the year’s best sports stories. Pick up your copy in Eason’s, or order it here today (€10):
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
5 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Tipp chief insists Forde 'guilty by association' in last April's high-profile incident with Davy Fitz
THE CONTROVERSIAL SUSPENSION handed down to Jason Forde after the clash with Davy Fitzgerald in last April’s hurling league semi-final remains a source of frustration to Tipperary.
Tipperary secretary Tim Floyd, writing in his report ahead of next Sunday’s annual county convention, expressed his belief that Silvermines player Forde ‘was just guilty by association’ and suffered due to the high-profile nature of ‘one of the personalities involved’ in the incident.
23-year-old Forde was punished for contributing ‘to a melee’ but the definition of this term is an ‘issue of contention’ with Floyd.
The incident grabbed the headlines in the Nowlan Park clash when Wexford boss Fitzgerald went onto the pitch to remonstrate with referee Diarmuid Kirwan following Tipperary’s second goal and clashed with Premier players Niall O’Meara and Forde.
Subsequently Forde was slapped with a proposed two-match suspension and Floyd has outlined Tipperary’s response to that sanction.
“The player, team manager and county board all agreed we should challenge this charge and we sought a hearing with the Central Hearings Committee (CHC). Indeed
the general public were shocked with the proposed suspension and would have been disappointed if we did not challenge it.
“The two match suspension would rule Jason out of the league final plus the Munster championship versus Cork which was a harsh sentence for a very trivial incident. Both the referee’s report and the sideline officials report made no mention of Jason Forde but the CCCC in their wisdom deemed it an assault.
“Our argument at the hearing was based on the word assault as the video clip only showed Jason pushing the Wexford manager and we also argued that Jason was being victimised due to the publicity around the incident.
“Most games include this type of “argy bargy” especially when an incoming sub is being greeted by his opponent so if this was being treated as an offence it opens the door to numerous similar incidents in games.
“We convinced the CHC as they concluded that jostling and pushing was not deemed an assault and so they decided that the infraction as alleged was not proven. Unfortunately they decided that the evidence did disclose an infraction less serious, that is to say “to contribute to a melee” for which they were imposing a one match suspension.
“Meanwhile Jason had played the league final and so would miss the Munster championship game v Cork. Once again we decided to challenge the decision of the CHC and we sought and received a hearing from the Central Appeals Committee (CAC).
“At the appeal we argued that a melee was never discussed at the hearing and Jason Forde could not have contributed to a melee if there was no melee.
“Once you go to a higher appeal body (The CAC) you are no longer challenging the original substantive issue, but the actual procedures adopted by the Hearings Committee in reaching their decision.
“We questioned the Central Hearings Committee’s right to bring forward a new charge that was not even mentioned at the hearing and argued they were not within their right to conclude that a melee occurred.
“The definition of the word melee also became central to the case. Our dictionaries defined a melee as involving many people or a throng, but the chairman of the CHC in his evidence said they defined it as three or more pushing and shoving and the person who starts a melee is regarded as contributing.
“The Central Appeals Committee upheld the decision of the Central Hearings and we lost the case. We decided against going to the Disputes Resolution Authorities (DRA) as Jason felt it was becoming too much of a distraction before an important championship game and so he served his one match ban on the sidelines against Cork just two weeks later.
“It’s very frustrating and disappointing to lose a disciplinary hearing especially when you see similar incidents in every game not being investigated. I still believe Jason Forde was just guilty by association in an incident that received wide scale publicity because of the high profile of one of the personalities involved.
“The definition of a melee as being a minimum of three people involved is still an issue of contention with me and I’m hoping to have it defined in the GAA Official Guide by passing a motion at our Co. Convention to be sent to Congress for consideration.”
The42 has just published its first book, Behind The Lines, a collection of some of the year’s best sports stories. Pick up your copy in Eason’s, or order it here today (€10):
Here are the 2018 Cork senior football and hurling championship draws
Heavy snow forces postponement of Leinster final and All-Ireland quarter-final
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
clash of the ash Davy Fitzgerald Jason Forde Tipperary Wexford