Overview
(Sweden’s starting XI for the second-leg play-off against Denmark)
LIKE IRELAND, SWEDEN qualified for Euro 2016 the hard way — via the playoffs.
The Swedes also arguably had a far easier group than the Boys in Green.
While Ireland had to finish above decent, well-organised sides such as Scotland and Georgia (who defeated the Euro 2012 champions Spain on Tuesday), as well as taking four points off the world champions Germany, Sweden’s third-place finish was more easily achieved.
Erik Hamrén’s team finished above unquestionably two of the worst teams in Europe — Liechtenstein and Moldova, as well as Montenegro, who are slightly better but still ranked as low as 90th in the world (Sweden are 35th — two places below Ireland).
The Swedes also finished 10 and two points below Austria and Russia respectively, who sealed the automatic qualification spots in the group.
Their record over the course of their group qualifiers was less than spectacular, as they won five, drew three and lost two. Moreover, the campaign included a draw with Montenegro and an emphatic 4-1 defeat at home to Austria.
Sweden had one advantage that others didn’t, however — they so happened to have one of the world’s best strikers at their disposal.
Unquestionably their standout player, Zlatan Ibrahimovic scored 11 goals in 10 matches over the course of qualifying (they managed 19 goals in total), including three when it mattered most, in the play-off games against Denmark.
Aside from Ibrahimovic, Sweden’s Euro 2016 squad contains a collection of workmanlike players who compensate for a lack of talent with impressive application.
Unfashionable sides such as Malmo, Leipzig, Trabzonspor and Sunderland are represented in the Swedes’ squad.
Yet as they showed in the play-offs against the Danes, Sweden and Ibrahimovic in particular can be extremely dangerous if there is the smallest error or lapse in concentration in their opponents’ backline.
The following are five elements that Martin O’Neill will have noted as key from the Swedish side’s second-leg play-off back in November, which they drew 2-2 on the night, allowing them to advance 4-3 on aggregate.
1. Stopping Ibrahimovic is key to stopping Sweden
It’s an obvious point but one that still can’t be overlooked.
Calling Sweden a one-man team would be unfair given the endeavour and organisation of the side, but it’s hard to think of any other player in the competition who is so integral to his side’s hopes of success.
The 34-year-old gave a classic striker’s performance against Denmark. For long periods, as Sweden defended doggedly and allowed Denmark to try to break them down, it was easy to forget that Ibrahimovic was playing.
While every other player in the Swedish side is expected to work extremely hard off the ball, and stick rigidly to the system, it’s clear that the striker is indulged to an extent on account of his immense talent.
Ibrahimovic is not expected to do as much running or defensive work off the ball as the other players and is instead allowed to preserve his energy and roam around the pitch throughout matches.
Notice the star’s lack of movement in the clip above, as he simply allows the defender to run forward with the ball.
Also see the image below in which nine Sweden defenders are doing their utmost to stop the Danish attack, while Ibra can be seen strolling far away from the action, barely in shot.
Such behaviour would not be tolerated from anyone other than an exceptionally talented star, and the Sweden striker certainly fits the bill in that regard. In 113 internationals, he has 62 goals — just five less than Robbie Keane has managed in 143 games for Ireland. Furthermore, at club level, he has won the league title in 13 of his last 15 seasons — a phenomenal run that few players can match.
Against Denmark, Ibrahimovic delivered the type of game-changing moments for which he has become synonymous. His free-kick (see below) was obviously exquisite, as he curled the ball over the wall and beat one of best goalkeepers in the Premier League by some distance — Martin O’Neill will therefore undoubtedly be telling the Irish players to avoid giving silly fouls away around the edge of the area.
However, as good as the second goal was, the first (see below from 0.52 on) was arguably just as impressive in its own way. His movement is exceptional, as he times a run to perfection, which allows him to meet the ball a split second ahead of his marker, Riza Durmisi. His first-time finish into the corner of the net is perfect, and was crucial in the context of the tie. Such speed of thought is consequently what makes a truly great footballer.
Ibrahimovic had one other decent chance, with Schmeichel doing well to close the space and save with his legs, but that anomaly aside, the Swedish superstar was typically lethal when given half a chance. Despite struggling to get in the game at times, the veteran striker simply looked a class above anyone else on the field when he did get the ball.
In order to minimise his influence, Ireland need try to cut off the supply to the forward, with Glenn Whelan and James McCarthy (assuming they both play) vital in this regard. John O’Shea and Richard Keogh (presuming they are the central defensive pairing who start) will also need to mark Ibrahimovic incredibly tightly, and learn from the first goal Denmark conceded among many other examples of his brilliance.
2. Sweden look vulnerable from set pieces
While both Sweden’s goals came from set pieces, they were less convincing down the other end in dealing with this threat.
The Swedes were given a warning sign early on, as a failure to win the first ball caused chaos in the penalty area, and resulted in Kim Kallstrom almost diverting the ball into his own net.
Balls into the box in general proved problematic for the Swedes. In the second half, the visitors’ failure to deal with a long throw enabled Christian Eriksen to attempt a half volley that again rebounded fortuitously.
It may not have been from a set piece, but Denmark’s opener, when it eventually came, exposed Sweden’s frailties in the air, as Leipzig striker Yussuf Poulsen leapt above his marker to head home (see video below from 2.53 on).
The equaliser, meanwhile, was from a set piece, as Jannik Vestergaard was allowed to head home unchallenged (see video above from 3.31 on).
Therefore, clearly, Sweden are not comfortable dealing with a good ball into the box. The likes of Robbie Brady, Shane Long and Jon Walters, all of whom proved adept at either delivering or getting on the end of set pieces during Ireland’s qualifying campaign, should all take note.
3. Beating the offside trap
Denmark for much of the game were poor and creatively inept.
Star player Christian Eriksen was particularly disappointing, as he produced too many misplaced passes and failed to dictate play and influence the game the way he so often does at Tottenham.
Consequently, even with the visitors’ backline looking shaky at times, Denmark seldom appeared capable of exploiting this weakness.
Yet there was one example of note whereby Denmark highlighted the weakness and lack of pace in their opponents’ backline. It only took a routine long ball forward to enable Poulsen to break the Swedes’ attempted offside trip. The Danish attacker then rode a weak tackle before producing a disappointing finish straight at Andreas Isaksson.
Ireland’s main creator, Wes Hoolahan, will need to put in a better performance than Eriksen, but if the Norwich player can make an impact and thread balls through to the speedy Shane Long, Sweden’s somewhat sluggish backline could be in serious trouble.
4. Overcoming organisation and discipline
Ireland will really want to avoid going a goal behind, as — aside from the final 10 minutes of the game when it was effectively over — Sweden showed that they are adept at defending a lead.
Denmark dominated the early stages of the game, as the graphic above showing attempts on goal emphasises. In total, the hosts had 61% possession and 20 shots on goal compared with their rivals’ six.
Yet Sweden survived the early storm. They hung in there, before Ibrahimovic’s goal out of nowhere shattered the Danes’ confidence, with the home side looking far less of a threat for a considerable period thereafter.
It was a classic defensive performance from the Swedes, with their solid centre-backs and midfield work-horses all contriving to frustrate Denmark time and again, slowly sapping the morale of Morten Olsen’s side in the process.
Sweden essentially adopted the Leicester City philosophy with two banks of four and a team of tireless players proving extremely difficult to break down
A no-risk approach was favoured, with aimless long balls commonplace and possession football rarely attempted.
The magic of Ibrahimovic aside, it wasn’t pretty from Sweden’s perspective, but it was undoubtedly effective in curbing the Danish threat for long periods of the match.
5. Controlling possession
Sweden seem like the only team in the group against whom Ireland are capable of dominating possession, and vice versa.
Against Denmark in the second leg, they often used Ibrahimovic as a target man and attempted to find him with long passes.
Emil Forsberg, the 24-year-old RB Leipzig winger who had scored the opening goal in the first leg also looked a threat at times, with his darting runs forward from midfield (Glenn Whelan should perhaps study his game closely).
While pragmatism remains the overriding feature of O’Neill’s side, they have shown a sporadic tendency to try to play the ball to feet and adopt a more technical game, particularly when the creatively bright Wes Hoolahan is in the team.
Whether they can do this successfully in the pressurised circumstances of the Euros against a hard-working Swedish side is unclear, however, it’s surely their best chance to exhibit the side’s attacking prowess, with Belgium and Italy both likely to be very much backs-to-the-wall performances by contrast.
Conclusion
Most people consider the Sweden match in particular to be must-win game and it is probably a fair assessment of the situation.
They are the lowest-ranked team in the group with arguably the weakest collection of players — although Ibrahimovic is a notable exception.
Ireland will likely aim to go about beating them by encouraging the likes of Shane Long and Jon Walters to bully a Swedish backline that looks ill-equipped to deal with the Irish players’ aerial threat.
Long in particular will hope to expose the side’s vulnerable-looking offside trap by using his pace to get away from Sweden’s sluggish backline, while Ireland will need to pay extremely close attention to Ibrahimovic, with even the slightest lapse in concentration likely to be punished ruthlessly by the Man United target.
Meanwhile, Sweden will be the one side that Ireland will feel somewhat confident playing an expansive, attack-minded and possession-based game against, with the two teams’ overall ability roughly equal, as indicated by their similar world rankings.
Sweden’s greater major tournament experience could also be a factor. While this is just the third time in history that Ireland have qualified for the tournament, the Swedes have managed to reach the last five Euros on the bounce — though they missed out on the last World Cup after being beaten by a Cristiano Ronaldo-inspired Portugal in the play-offs.
All of which makes for an intriguing contest when the sides meet in Paris on 13 June in what will likely be an extremely tight and cagey encounter. While the two teams are relatively compact if not totally infallible defensively, they are also not especially adventurous in attack — in the group qualifiers, Ireland conceded just seven goals but scored only 19 (or eight goals in eight games excluding the two Gibraltar matches), while Sweden scored 15 and conceded nine (or five excluding that one disastrous Austria home encounter).
The42 is on Snapchat! Tap the button below on your phone to add!
Good point for United, move to within 37 of Liverpool
@Seàn Mc: Have to make up for the disappointment of yesterday somehow I suppose Seanie
@Seàn Mc: did u use a calculator for that remark??? Very surprised scouser lovers can use such a complicated machine. Well done to u!!!
@Thomas Rowe: we need a calculator to count the amount of VAR decisions United have got lately!
@Dave WR: and liverpool have never got a VAR decision their way…. the rules are the rules…..
@Paul O’Sullivan: course Liverpool have, but nowhere near the amount United have got…despite what people mite think!
@Thomas Rowe: Is a calculator really that complicated for you Tom? God help you
@Dave WR: it’s still the rules of the game. Yes we know VAR is flawed, but are you Liverpool fans seriously suggesting that there is some sort of conspiracy to give Man UTD VAR decisions in their favour ??
@Seàn Mc: and when Liverpool lift the title, how many will that be against Utd?
@Seàn Mc: True, and you can’t count how many EPL trophies Liverpool need to catch up to United on both hands either
@Dave WR: it’s ok if you can’t count no one will hold it against you. Maybe ask Santa for one at Christmas
@Thomas Rowe: don’t worry he’s probably from Norway
@chihuahua: Sky sports didn’t invent football!!
@chihuahua: Sky invented football in 1992…..
@Paul O’Sullivan: as if you Manc fans haven’t been banging on about that all season. Let’s just wait til the end of May and see which club has benefitted most.
@John Strahan: it doesn’t really matter who has benefited more.. its currently used in all premier league games… it is now part of the game,… people have been going on about referees for decades now we have this technology, to assist the referee, you complain….
It is not United’s fault if they benefit more than Liverpool from VAR, There is no hidden agenda.
@Paul O’Sullivan: hahaaa, when it works in your favour. LiVARpool has become VARchester United. Personally, I didn’t complain when Liverpool had a goal disallowed against Utd, home and away. It’s part of the game. It would not, in any way, change what Liverpool have achieved over the past 14 months. It’s does, however, reflect on Man Utds achievements, VAR has become like Ferguson’s watch, indicative of where the money men need Utd to be.
@John Strahan: you may slag Fergusson over his watch, but you have to admit it that he was the innovator of the exact injury time allocation with the fourth official uo to then it was up to the discretion of the referee. and you also must admit that Liverpool have benefited their share of injury time winners this season….. enjoy your success while it lasts because as you already know and fans of both clubs know you can go along time not winning the league after years of success.
But there is always 74,000 at Old Trafford you scouser will never match that innthe modern game…
@Paul O’Sullivan: a “bigger stadium” is that what it’s come to? Wow how the mighty have fallen. Fergie wouldn’t be impressed by tHt Paul
@Seàn Mc: great to see you sticking up for Everton your city rivals… On here last year criticising anybody who cheered on City. Hypocrite much? Your about to win the league don’t let your bitterness of utd spoil that.
@my name: bigger stadium for the bigger trophy cabinet .
@Paul O’Sullivan: that ain’t what you said though pauly is it. While you’re at it do a count on the auld trophy haul for both clubs
@my name: Manchester Utd have won 66 Trophys in Total Liverpool have 63, I have included the Community Shield.
@Paul O’Sullivan: as the charity shield has been shared at times on the official trophy haul count it doesn’t stand
@my name: both clubs are claiming Charity shields in their Honours list so it stands.
I’m sure if it were the other way round you would be happy to rub my nose in it…
@Paul O’Sullivan: not at all. The charity shield can go on a club’s honours list absolutely but when doing the official count, FIFA doesn’t recognize it due to it being shared over the years
@my name: get rid off all the Micky mouse cups then, andckeave it to Championships , Fa Cups , European Cups, UEAFA, and Cup winners Cups actual Tournaments Leafue and Group Competition UTD have more than Liverpool..
@Paul O’Sullivan: Ok we can dispute this till the cows come home after excluding one match trophies I make 43 a piece. But Liverpool will win the League this year.which will give the edge, Unless UTD pull of an FA Cup..
@Paul O’Sullivan: so back to your original post I replied to? Bigger stadium is that all you got now hahaha
Everton absolutely robbed at the end.
Everton were robbed by that VAR decision at the end
@Dow Dubrov: Incorrect. He is offside if he is interfering with play.
It’s not up to De Gea to know if he is offside or not and by pulling his legs in at the last second he has interfered with play. He was on a hiding to nothing because if he didn’t move he would have blocked the goal but regardless he has interfered with play.
Harsh on Everton but correct.
@Mark Coote: how many times do players move out of the way of the ball and are deemed to be not interfering with play. Goal should have stood.
@Mark Coote: How was he interfering with play? De Gea had a clear line of sight to the strike. He moved to his right to try and save it before the deflection. Once it was deflected, there was no way De Gea was going to get near it. Sigurdsson’s presence had no impact on the play whatsover
@Mark Coote: not so sure. The movement from DeGea when the ball was struck would indicate that Sigurdson didn’t obstruct his line of sight, and the deflection rendered the offside void. Moving his legs didn’t interfere with play as the ball was going in.
@Mark Coote: how can he be offside when the ball through deflected off a united player?
@Karl Cranny: its offside because it is in favour of utd simple
@Karl Cranny: He is still offside when the ball is struck before the deflection.
@Mark Coote: correct
@John Strahan: evidence you are wrong is that the referee and officals using var implement the rules and deemed the player offside – doesn’t matter if you don’t like it or disagree with the rules -he was offside
As a United fan, that was the first of the recent VAR decisions that I thought was incorrect. Everton could have had a penalty for the tackle of Sigurdsson and ruling the goal out was harsh. Completely got away with that
@Mossy: he didn’t touch the ball in the end. Not offside
@Ross: think it was given because the keepers view was impeded by an offside player
@Ross: was in an offside position and adjusted his body(pulled his legs away) to directly influence the direction of the ball. Rules are rules regardless if he touched it or not. If he hadn’t moved his legs the ball would have hit him
@A Cos: de gea was getting nowhere near it.. He didn’t touch the ball. Its a goal. United get away it it
@A Cos: seriously? Not touching the ball influenced it’s direction? That’s a new one
@Ross: you don’t have to touch the ball to interfere. That rules has been there a long time. Saying that I thought it was harsh De Gea was getting nowhere near it either way
@A Cos: how can he be offside when the ball through deflected off a United player?
@Karl Cranny: he was offside when the shot was taken. Offside all day. He moved out of the way of the ball therefor he interfered with play!
@Joe: how can you interfere by not influencing anything at all? The deflection had DeGea heading the wrong way (off a United player), he was on his arse (I wonder how that happened) and didn’t even touch the ball. United fans are bending and twisting the rules in their favour yet again. No offside and no interface.
@Karl Cranny: he was “interfering” with play, in an off side position. This is not a new concept.
@James Reardon: the fact the keeper moved, correctly, in the direction the original ball was struck would suggest that his view was not impeded by the opposition player on the ground. It was a weak call. But if I was a SKY executive, concerned about whether Man Utd or Sheffield Utd, or Wolves, got into Europe, it’s the call I’d make.
@Mossy: agree with you on that, but at Old Trafford thought the Everton goal should have been disallowed for the challenge on De Gea so maybe it all balances out in the end
@Karl Cranny: utd fans bending and twisting the rules??? VAR not make the decision?
How United fans can come up with LiVARpool baffles me, more like Varchester United, that was a perfectly fine goal at the end
@Karl Cranny: and I remember Liverpool getting a perfectly good goal disallowed for a push in De Gea.
@Ciarán Ó Dubhda: …for every flip up where De Gea costs United a goal, some ref saves him from conceding another at this stage.
@Ciarán Ó Dubhda: and uniteds goal in the 1.1 at OT had a foul on origi.. Also not even looked at by var
@Patrick Fitzgerald: that goal was looked at by var ffs, the the decision was no foul given as origi dived.
Robbed at the end Everton, de gea gettin nowhere near that ball even if a Sumo wrestler was in front of him!!
@Dougal67: what are you on about????
@devils avacado: I’ll type slowly for yeh dev, he wasn’t gettin to the ball anyway!!!
@Dougal67: They actually have it for blocking the view of the keeper on the shot. Replays clearly show DeGea had a perfect view. Poor decision
Varchester united… Thats the fourth time in the last few games that they’ve been bailed out by var, three times against chelsea and now against everton
@Eoin Murphy: and every time VAR was correct
@Sean Dalton: except for the Maguire red card, the 1st Chelsea goal and now the Everton goal!
@Sean Dalton: how so? It wasn’t offside as the Ball deflected through off a United player, that also eliminates the interference call. Varchester United strikes again.
@Karl Cranny: go away and learn the rules of football. Comeback when you understand the offside rule!
@Dave WR: jaysus if all you can do is be miserable and obsess about a 5th place man united when your team is winning the league by so much maybe its time you should find some other sport or hobby ffs
Varchester United again… If it was the other way around, goal
If it was offside them should it not have been brought back for a penalty. Sigurdsson got taken out of it when shooting. And it was a shocking offside decision. De gea was never getting and how could he have his view blocked
Utd are miles better with Bruno in the team, the whole team actually looks like they have a game plan now,, all the players are much more comfortable on the ball and the team look capable and of scoring goals. The difference a real world class player can make to the team,, Everton a little unlucky at the end, Carlo has them playing much better since he arrived, another team that has a good attacking threat. IMO.
@devils avacado: well said.
@devils avacado: they are playing Everton. Don’t get too carried away
I’m sure that would have been ruled out if it was a United winner at OT in the 92nd min……
@Dave WR: Similarly, Keane and Souness would have been singing a very different tune in the studio at the end.
Bruno best player on the pitch but credit to de gea and Pickford after the mistakes with World class saves.utd got out of jail.. Thank you var
De Gea is already beaten by the deflection and is going the wrong way. Sigurdsson does not effect his decision to go right in an attempt to save the ball.
Ill take that result all day. Bruno looked good again. Matic also had a good game.
@Brian Dunne: Matic good player but can’t run like he used to.
@Martin McKenna: matic never had pace hence why he was always a holding midfielder, never box to box has been bang in form last few months. Very underrated.
Can’t wait to hear the United mangers post game interview : Ole Gonna Sulk Sher
How easy a chance does igahlo need to score..
@Sean Murphy: he hit the target to be fair. Great save
Nothing to do with var,no var they would have disallowed it anyway,if it was for united they would have let it stand
@Thomas Ryan: it was giving before VAR were you watching the match or off at a gaa game?????
Mancs are now +8 with Var decisions this season more than anyone else, for comparison Liverpool and City are both +1, from ESPN.com.
Also have the most penalties awarded for (10) and only one against.
For the majority of the season so far, Manc fans have been consistently commenting about officiating decisions favouring Liverpool but as can be seen clearly from the numbers,they have benefitted the Mancs most who are still 37 points adrift.
@Peter Dunne: you do know it’s banter Peter? None of us play for either team… Congrats on been 37 points ahead of utd. I’m sure jurgan klopp has really appreciated your contribution this season.
@Peter Dunne: Refs have handed united many a league over the years, its obvious the FA is bent…..just thank god they are not up the top of the league because all of the above could be the difference between winning and losing a title, 10 penos and countless dodgy var calls going their way…..its not an accident.
@Peter Hughes: rather than come on here with this info maybe you should put a report together about corruption in English football? Go to the English police with this report. No room for corruption in sport of any kind. Particularly the var calls, your info could revolutionise the game in England possibly the world. I for one back you.
@Peter Hughes: tin foil hat stuff lads.
Football is obviously very emotive and especially when scoring, or conceding goals, but I wonder will it ever happen that players won’t be in such a rush to complain and berate the referee in the immediate aftermath, given that every goal now, is checked by VAR, and the ref, like everyone else, is just an interested onlooker at that point!
@Joe L: see the United players over to shout at the referee after goal was given, just like the game at Anfield. Some things never change
Everton, like many of the bottom half sides, are the Stoke of the premier league. Get stuck in and are constantly looking for a set piece to try and capitalise on. Not easy on the eye but effective all the same.